文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

作者信息

Kallmes David F, Comstock Bryan A, Heagerty Patrick J, Turner Judith A, Wilson David J, Diamond Terry H, Edwards Richard, Gray Leigh A, Stout Lydia, Owen Sara, Hollingworth William, Ghdoke Basavaraj, Annesley-Williams Deborah J, Ralston Stuart H, Jarvik Jeffrey G

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):569-79. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563.


DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0900563
PMID:19657122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2930487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 131 patients who had one to three painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures to undergo either vertebroplasty or a simulated procedure without cement (control group). The primary outcomes were scores on the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) (on a scale of 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating greater disability) and patients' ratings of average pain intensity during the preceding 24 hours at 1 month (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain). Patients were allowed to cross over to the other study group after 1 month. RESULTS: All patients underwent the assigned intervention (68 vertebroplasties and 63 simulated procedures). The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At 1 month, there was no significant difference between the vertebroplasty group and the control group in either the RDQ score (difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.3 to 2.8; P=0.49) or the pain rating (difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.7; P=0.19). Both groups had immediate improvement in disability and pain scores after the intervention. Although the two groups did not differ significantly on any secondary outcome measure at 1 month, there was a trend toward a higher rate of clinically meaningful improvement in pain (a 30% decrease from baseline) in the vertebroplasty group (64% vs. 48%, P=0.06). At 3 months, there was a higher crossover rate in the control group than in the vertebroplasty group (51% vs. 13%, P<0.001) [corrected]. There was one serious adverse event in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in pain and pain-related disability associated with osteoporotic compression fractures in patients treated with vertebroplasty were similar to the improvements in a control group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00068822.)

摘要

相似文献

[1]
A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

N Engl J Med. 2009-8-6

[2]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-11-6

[3]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-4

[4]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-4-30

[5]
A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

N Engl J Med. 2009-8-6

[6]
Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a randomised controlled trial [ACTRN012605000079640].

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008-11-25

[7]
[Can vertebroplasty still be responsibly used for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures? Results of two randomized placebo-controlled trials].

Unfallchirurg. 2010-1

[8]
Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial.

BMJ. 2018-5-9

[9]
[Vertebroplasty for pain reduction in osteoporotic vertebral fracture: possibly only a placebo effect?].

Radiologe. 2010-4

[10]
Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial.

Lancet. 2010-8-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Optimal management for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a network meta-analysis.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-8-30

[2]
Risk factors of residual back pain after vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-7-25

[3]
Posterior dynamic stabilization in addition to kyphoplasty for surgical management of unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-7-19

[4]
Conservative Treatment with Teriparatide Versus Vertebroplasty for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

J Clin Med. 2025-6-4

[5]
Restoration of Sagittal Alignment and Pulmonary Function With Percutaneous Vertebral Body Augmentation for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2025-5-7

[6]
Incidence of new osteoporotic adjacent vertebral body fractures. A comparison between conservative treatment and vertebral body augmentation (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Surg. 2025-5-20

[7]
Comparative Analysis of Romosozumab Versus Vertebroplasty With Denosumab: Efficacy, Safety, and Secondary Bone Mineral Density Outcomes.

Neurospine. 2025-3

[8]
Efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation techniques in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A single center, retrospective, observational study.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-3-5

[9]
ESR Essentials: percutaneous bone consolidation-practice recommendations by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology.

Eur Radiol. 2025-3-6

[10]
Evaluating the effect of early balloon kyphoplasty on adjacent vertebral fracture risk in osteoporotic vertebral fracture management: a retrospective study.

Asian Spine J. 2025-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2009-3-21

[2]
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008-1-1

[3]
INvestigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007-12-20

[4]
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

J Pain. 2008-2

[5]
Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007-4

[6]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007-3

[7]
Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Spine J. 2007-8

[8]
Prospective clinical follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006-8

[9]
Percutaneous vertebroplasty: functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-5-1

[10]
Clinical outcomes after acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a 2-year non-randomised trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy.

Med J Aust. 2006-2-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索