Kallmes David F, Comstock Bryan A, Heagerty Patrick J, Turner Judith A, Wilson David J, Diamond Terry H, Edwards Richard, Gray Leigh A, Stout Lydia, Owen Sara, Hollingworth William, Ghdoke Basavaraj, Annesley-Williams Deborah J, Ralston Stuart H, Jarvik Jeffrey G
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):569-79. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900563.
Vertebroplasty is commonly used to treat painful, osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 131 patients who had one to three painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures to undergo either vertebroplasty or a simulated procedure without cement (control group). The primary outcomes were scores on the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) (on a scale of 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating greater disability) and patients' ratings of average pain intensity during the preceding 24 hours at 1 month (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain). Patients were allowed to cross over to the other study group after 1 month.
All patients underwent the assigned intervention (68 vertebroplasties and 63 simulated procedures). The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. At 1 month, there was no significant difference between the vertebroplasty group and the control group in either the RDQ score (difference, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.3 to 2.8; P=0.49) or the pain rating (difference, 0.7; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.7; P=0.19). Both groups had immediate improvement in disability and pain scores after the intervention. Although the two groups did not differ significantly on any secondary outcome measure at 1 month, there was a trend toward a higher rate of clinically meaningful improvement in pain (a 30% decrease from baseline) in the vertebroplasty group (64% vs. 48%, P=0.06). At 3 months, there was a higher crossover rate in the control group than in the vertebroplasty group (51% vs. 13%, P<0.001) [corrected]. There was one serious adverse event in each group.
Improvements in pain and pain-related disability associated with osteoporotic compression fractures in patients treated with vertebroplasty were similar to the improvements in a control group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00068822.)
椎体成形术常用于治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。
在这项多中心试验中,我们将131例有一至三处疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的患者随机分为两组,分别接受椎体成形术或不使用骨水泥的模拟手术(对照组)。主要结局指标为改良罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RDQ)评分(范围为0至23分,分数越高表明残疾程度越高)以及患者对前24小时平均疼痛强度的评分(范围为0至10分,分数越高表明疼痛越严重),评估时间为术后1个月。1个月后允许患者交叉至另一研究组。
所有患者均接受了指定的干预措施(68例椎体成形术和63例模拟手术)。两组的基线特征相似。术后1个月,椎体成形术组与对照组在RDQ评分(差值为0.7;95%置信区间[CI]为-1.3至2.8;P = 0.49)或疼痛评分(差值为0.7;95%CI为-0.3至1.7;P = 0.19)方面均无显著差异。两组在干预后残疾和疼痛评分均立即改善。虽然两组在术后1个月的任何次要结局指标上均无显著差异,但椎体成形术组疼痛出现具有临床意义改善(较基线降低30%)的比例有更高的趋势(64%对48%,P = 0.06)。术后3个月,对照组的交叉率高于椎体成形术组(51%对13%,P<0.001)[校正后]。每组均发生1例严重不良事件。
椎体成形术治疗的骨质疏松性压缩骨折患者在疼痛及与疼痛相关的残疾方面的改善与对照组相似。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00068822。)