Suppr超能文献

农村乳腺癌患者原发性治疗后生活质量的心理教育支持干预的初步评估。

Preliminary evaluation of psychoeducational support interventions on quality of life in rural breast cancer survivors after primary treatment.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, GM029, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;32(5):385-97. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181a850e6.

Abstract

Although most cancer survivors are at risk for being lost in the transition from treatment to survivorship, rural breast cancer survivors face special challenges that might place them at particular risk. This small-scale preliminary study had 2 specific aims: (aim 1) establish the feasibility of rural breast cancer survivors participation in a longitudinal quality of life (QOL) intervention trial and (aim 2) determine the effects of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) on overall QOL. Fifty-three rural breast cancer survivors were randomized to either an experimental (n = 27) or a wait-control arm (n = 26). Participants in the experimental arm received the BCEI consisting of 3 face-to-face education and support sessions and 2 face-to-face and 3 telephone follow-up sessions, along with supplemental written and audiotape materials over a 6-month period. Breast Cancer Education Intervention modules and interventions are organized within a QOL framework. To address the possible effects of attention, wait-control participants received 3 face-to-face sessions and 3 telephone sessions during the first 6 months of participation in the study, but not the BCEI intervention. Research questions addressing aim 1 were as follows: (a) can rural breast cancer survivors be recruited into a longitudinal intervention trial, and (b) can their participation be retained. Research questions for aim 2 were as follows: (a) do participants who received the BCEI show improvement in overall QOL, and (b) is the QOL improvement sustained over time. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear mixed models. Results demonstrated the ability to recruit and retain 53 rural breast cancer survivors, that the experimental arm showed improvement in overall QOL (P = .013), and that there were significant differences in overall QOL between the experimental and wait-control groups at both months 3 and 6. Thus, it appears that at least some rural breast cancer survivors can and will participate in a larger trial and will maintain their participation and that those that do participate experience significant QOL benefit.

摘要

尽管大多数癌症幸存者在从治疗过渡到生存阶段时都有被忽视的风险,但农村乳腺癌幸存者面临着特殊的挑战,这可能使他们面临特别的风险。这项小规模的初步研究有两个具体目标:(目标 1)确定农村乳腺癌幸存者参与纵向生活质量(QOL)干预试验的可行性,(目标 2)确定乳腺癌教育干预(BCEI)对整体 QOL 的影响。53 名农村乳腺癌幸存者被随机分为实验组(n=27)或等待对照组(n=26)。实验组参与者接受了 BCEI,包括 3 次面对面的教育和支持会议,以及 2 次面对面和 3 次电话随访会议,同时在 6 个月内提供补充的书面和录音带材料。乳腺癌教育干预模块和干预措施是在 QOL 框架内组织的。为了应对关注的可能影响,等待对照组在研究的前 6 个月内接受了 3 次面对面会议和 3 次电话会议,但没有接受 BCEI 干预。针对目标 1 的研究问题如下:(a)能否招募农村乳腺癌幸存者参加纵向干预试验,以及(b)能否保留他们的参与。针对目标 2 的研究问题如下:(a)接受 BCEI 的参与者是否在整体 QOL 方面有所改善,以及(b)QOL 的改善是否随着时间的推移而持续。使用重复测量的一般线性混合模型分析数据。结果表明,能够招募和保留 53 名农村乳腺癌幸存者,实验组在整体 QOL 方面有所改善(P=.013),并且实验组和等待对照组在第 3 个月和第 6 个月的整体 QOL 之间存在显著差异。因此,至少一些农村乳腺癌幸存者可以并且愿意参加更大规模的试验,并且他们将保持参与,并且那些参与者确实体验到了显著的 QOL 改善。

相似文献

3
Quality of life in older women with early-stage breast cancer in the first year of survivorship.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Nov;35(6):924-32. doi: 10.1188/08.ONF.924-932.
6
Does rurality affect quality of life following treatment for breast cancer?
J Rural Health. 2010 Fall;26(4):402-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00295.x.
7
Home-based multidimensional survivorship programmes for breast cancer survivors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):CD011152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
8
Urban-Rural Variations in Quality-of-Life in Breast Cancer Survivors Prescribed Endocrine Therapy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 7;14(4):394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040394.
9
10
Patient-centered outcome evaluation of the Rural Breast Cancer Survivors Intervention.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Apr;24(4):1841-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2974-4. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.
J Public Health Res. 2024 Aug 5;13(3):22799036241268841. doi: 10.1177/22799036241268841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
The influence of telehealth-based cancer rehabilitation interventions on disability: a systematic review.
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1725-1750. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01181-4. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
5
A systematic review of behavioral interventions for rural breast cancer survivors.
J Behav Med. 2021 Aug;44(4):467-483. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00174-x. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
8
Experience With A Support Group Intervention Offered to Breast Cancer Women.
J Breast Health. 2017 Apr 1;13(2):54-61. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2017.3350. eCollection 2017 Apr.
9
After the Psychoeducational Intervention: Turkish Breast Cancer Survivors' Experiences.
Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Nov 5;15(1):37-42. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2018.4255. eCollection 2019 Jan.
10
Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review.
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jun;25(6):1993-2007. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3526-2. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

2
Transdisciplinary integration of electronic communication technology and nursing research.
Nurs Outlook. 2007 Sep-Oct;55(5):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.04.004.
4
Evaluation of a visit preparation intervention implemented in two rural, underserved counties of Northern California.
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):350-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
6
Rural-urban differences in the presentation, management and survival of breast cancer in Western Australia.
Breast. 2006 Dec;15(6):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
7
Re: Long-term survival following breast cancer surgery in Western Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):95; author reply 95. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03653.x.
9
Differences in the quality of breast cancer care among vulnerable populations.
Cancer. 2005 Dec 1;104(11):2347-58. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21443.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验