School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, GM029, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Cancer Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;32(5):385-97. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181a850e6.
Although most cancer survivors are at risk for being lost in the transition from treatment to survivorship, rural breast cancer survivors face special challenges that might place them at particular risk. This small-scale preliminary study had 2 specific aims: (aim 1) establish the feasibility of rural breast cancer survivors participation in a longitudinal quality of life (QOL) intervention trial and (aim 2) determine the effects of the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI) on overall QOL. Fifty-three rural breast cancer survivors were randomized to either an experimental (n = 27) or a wait-control arm (n = 26). Participants in the experimental arm received the BCEI consisting of 3 face-to-face education and support sessions and 2 face-to-face and 3 telephone follow-up sessions, along with supplemental written and audiotape materials over a 6-month period. Breast Cancer Education Intervention modules and interventions are organized within a QOL framework. To address the possible effects of attention, wait-control participants received 3 face-to-face sessions and 3 telephone sessions during the first 6 months of participation in the study, but not the BCEI intervention. Research questions addressing aim 1 were as follows: (a) can rural breast cancer survivors be recruited into a longitudinal intervention trial, and (b) can their participation be retained. Research questions for aim 2 were as follows: (a) do participants who received the BCEI show improvement in overall QOL, and (b) is the QOL improvement sustained over time. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures general linear mixed models. Results demonstrated the ability to recruit and retain 53 rural breast cancer survivors, that the experimental arm showed improvement in overall QOL (P = .013), and that there were significant differences in overall QOL between the experimental and wait-control groups at both months 3 and 6. Thus, it appears that at least some rural breast cancer survivors can and will participate in a larger trial and will maintain their participation and that those that do participate experience significant QOL benefit.
尽管大多数癌症幸存者在从治疗过渡到生存阶段时都有被忽视的风险,但农村乳腺癌幸存者面临着特殊的挑战,这可能使他们面临特别的风险。这项小规模的初步研究有两个具体目标:(目标 1)确定农村乳腺癌幸存者参与纵向生活质量(QOL)干预试验的可行性,(目标 2)确定乳腺癌教育干预(BCEI)对整体 QOL 的影响。53 名农村乳腺癌幸存者被随机分为实验组(n=27)或等待对照组(n=26)。实验组参与者接受了 BCEI,包括 3 次面对面的教育和支持会议,以及 2 次面对面和 3 次电话随访会议,同时在 6 个月内提供补充的书面和录音带材料。乳腺癌教育干预模块和干预措施是在 QOL 框架内组织的。为了应对关注的可能影响,等待对照组在研究的前 6 个月内接受了 3 次面对面会议和 3 次电话会议,但没有接受 BCEI 干预。针对目标 1 的研究问题如下:(a)能否招募农村乳腺癌幸存者参加纵向干预试验,以及(b)能否保留他们的参与。针对目标 2 的研究问题如下:(a)接受 BCEI 的参与者是否在整体 QOL 方面有所改善,以及(b)QOL 的改善是否随着时间的推移而持续。使用重复测量的一般线性混合模型分析数据。结果表明,能够招募和保留 53 名农村乳腺癌幸存者,实验组在整体 QOL 方面有所改善(P=.013),并且实验组和等待对照组在第 3 个月和第 6 个月的整体 QOL 之间存在显著差异。因此,至少一些农村乳腺癌幸存者可以并且愿意参加更大规模的试验,并且他们将保持参与,并且那些参与者确实体验到了显著的 QOL 改善。