Cobb J Perren, Ognibene Frederick P, Ingbar David H, Mann Henry J, Hoyt David B, Angus Derek C, Thomas Alvin V, Danner Robert L, Suffredini Anthony F
Center for Critical Illness and Health Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3158-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b03434.
Discuss the research needs of the critical illness and injury communities in the United States.
Workshop session held during the 5 National Institutes of Health Symposium on the Functional Genomics of Critical Illness and Injury (November 15, 2007).
The current clinical research infrastructure misses opportunities for synergy and does not address many important needs. In addition, it remains challenging to rapidly and properly implement system-wide changes based upon reproducible evidence from clinical research.
Author presentations, panel discussion, attendee feedback.
The critical illness and injury research communities seek better communication and interaction, both of which will improve the breadth and quality of acute care research. Success in meeting these needs should come from cooperative and strategic actions that favor collaboration, standardization of protocols, and strong leadership. An alliance framed on common goals will foster collaboration among experts to better promote clinical trials within the critically ill or injured patient population.
The U.S. Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group was funded to create a clinical research framework that can reduce the barriers to investigation using an investigator-initiated, evidence-driven, inclusive approach that has proven successful elsewhere. This alliance will provide an annual venue for systematic review and strategic planning that will include framing the research agenda, raising awareness for the value of acute care research, gathering and promoting best practices, and bolstering the critical care workforce.
探讨美国危重病和创伤群体的研究需求。
在国立卫生研究院关于危重病和创伤功能基因组学的第5次研讨会上举行的研讨会会议(2007年11月15日)。
当前的临床研究基础设施错失了协同合作的机会,未能满足许多重要需求。此外,基于临床研究可重复证据迅速且恰当地实施全系统变革仍然具有挑战性。
作者报告、小组讨论、参会者反馈。
危重病和创伤研究群体寻求更好的沟通与互动,这两者都将提高急性护理研究的广度和质量。满足这些需求的成功应来自有利于合作、方案标准化和强有力领导的合作性战略行动。基于共同目标构建的联盟将促进专家之间的合作,以更好地推动针对危重病或创伤患者群体的临床试验。
美国危重病和创伤试验小组获得资助,以创建一个临床研究框架,该框架可以采用研究者发起、证据驱动、包容性的方法来减少研究障碍,这种方法在其他地方已被证明是成功的。这个联盟将提供一个年度平台用于系统评价和战略规划,其中包括制定研究议程、提高对急性护理研究价值的认识、收集和推广最佳实践,以及加强重症护理人员队伍。