• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用小口径内镜获得的活检标本与使用传统内镜获得的标本具有相当的诊断性能:一项对 1335 个标本的前瞻性研究。

Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Fédération des Spécialités Digestives, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;44(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a1bebd.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a1bebd
PMID:19661817
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can be routinely performed via a nasal route in adults by using small-caliber endoscopes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy specimens obtained with small forceps for histologic diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January to April 2007, we prospectively compared all biopsy specimens obtained, during conventional EGD (8.8-mm-diameter endoscope), with (CS-EGD) or without sedation (C-EGD), and transnasal or transoral-EGD (4.9-mm-diameter endoscope) without sedation (T-EGD). All biopsy specimens were blindly evaluated by a pathologist. For each specimen, were recorded: site, biopsy size and thickness, type of lesion (focal or diffuse), and in case of focal abnormalities described by the endoscopist, presence of the histologic lesions in the targeted biopsies.

RESULTS

One thousand and thirty-five biopsy specimens were obtained from 300 procedures (109 T-EGD, 48 C-EGD, and 143 CS-EGD): 983 biopsy specimens were untargeted (esophagus and cardia in 21%, stomach in 85% and duodenum in 84%) and 352 biopsy specimens were targeted to focal lesions (esophagus and cardia in 79%, stomach in 15%, and duodenum in 16%). The mean size of specimens was 1.8, 2, 2.2 mm diameter, in T-EGD, C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P<0.001). The whole thickness of mucosa was present in 68%, 84%, 71% of the cases among T-EGD, C-EGD, and CS-EGD groups, respectively (P=0.9). There was no significant difference in the rate of definitive histologic diagnosis from targeted or nontargeted biopsies according to the endoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Biopsy specimens obtained during EGD with small forceps are as effective for diagnosis as those obtained with standard forceps.

摘要

背景和研究目的

食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)可通过使用小口径内镜经鼻常规进行。本研究的目的是评估使用小活检钳获得的活检标本进行组织学诊断的充分性。

患者和方法

2007 年 1 月至 4 月,我们前瞻性比较了所有在常规 EGD(8.8 毫米直径内镜)期间获得的活检标本,包括(CS-EGD)或无镇静(C-EGD),以及无镇静的经鼻或经口-EGD(4.9 毫米直径内镜)(T-EGD)。所有活检标本均由病理学家进行盲法评估。对于每个标本,记录:部位、活检大小和厚度、病变类型(局灶性或弥漫性),以及如果内镜医生描述了局灶性异常,在目标活检中是否存在组织学病变。

结果

从 300 例手术中获得了 1035 个活检标本(109 例 T-EGD、48 例 C-EGD 和 143 例 CS-EGD):983 个活检标本为非靶向(食管和贲门占 21%,胃占 85%,十二指肠占 84%),352 个活检标本为靶向局灶性病变(食管和贲门占 79%,胃占 15%,十二指肠占 16%)。T-EGD、C-EGD 和 CS-EGD 组标本的平均直径分别为 1.8、2 和 2.2 毫米(P<0.001)。T-EGD、C-EGD 和 CS-EGD 组中,黏膜全层存在的比例分别为 68%、84%和 71%(P=0.9)。根据内镜检查程序,靶向或非靶向活检的明确组织学诊断率无显著差异。

结论

使用小活检钳进行 EGD 时获得的活检标本与使用标准活检钳获得的活检标本一样有效用于诊断。

相似文献

1
Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.使用小口径内镜获得的活检标本与使用传统内镜获得的标本具有相当的诊断性能:一项对 1335 个标本的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;44(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a1bebd.
2
A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.一项关于非镇静经鼻小口径食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)与经口小口径EGD及传统EGD的随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):641-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41513.
3
Does a small biopsied gastric specimen limit the usage of two directional transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?小活检胃标本是否限制了双向经鼻胃镜的使用?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;25(2):270-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06029.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
4
Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.新型超薄单平面弯曲视频鼻胃镜用于经鼻食管胃十二指肠镜检查的前瞻性评估:性能与耐受性的比较研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.058.
5
Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.小口径与传统食管胃十二指肠镜检查评估食管静脉曲张的准确性及观察者间一致性
Endoscopy. 2007 Aug;39(8):673-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966351. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
6
A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.经鼻食管胃十二指肠镜检查安全性和耐受性的前瞻性随机对照研究
Endoscopy. 2005 Dec;37(12):1226-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921037.
7
Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.在常规门诊胃肠病学实践中,非镇静超薄上消化道内镜检查优于传统内镜检查:一项随机试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb 14;13(6):906-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906.
8
[Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].[比较传统和经鼻食管胃十二指肠镜检查用于常规诊断的前瞻性研究]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Jan 16;129(3):82-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-816291.
9
Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.非镇静经鼻与经口镇静上消化道内镜检查:一项关于安全性和患者可接受性的单组前瞻性研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;40(9):767-75. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.033. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
10
A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.上消化道内镜检查中单次插入使用多钳咬取的活检钳性能的前瞻性比较。
Endoscopy. 2003 Apr;35(4):338-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38147.

引用本文的文献

1
Duodenal Biopsies for Coeliac Disease: Does Size Matter?用于乳糜泻的十二指肠活检:大小重要吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(8):1000. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081000.
2
Transforming transnasal endoscopy services: A multicentre service evaluation pilot project.变革经鼻内镜检查服务:一项多中心服务评估试点项目。
Clin Med (Lond). 2025 Mar 4;25(3):100300. doi: 10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100300.
3
A single-center prospective study on pain alleviation during peroral upper endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope.单中心前瞻性研究:超细内镜行经口上消化道内镜检查时的镇痛效果。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02965-3.
4
Transnasal endoscopy: moving from endoscopy to the clinical outpatient-blue sky thinking in oesophageal testing.经鼻内镜检查:从内镜检查迈向临床门诊——食管检测中的大胆创新思维
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 May 31;13(e1):e65-e71. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102129. eCollection 2022.
5
Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy: A Safe, Well-Tolerated and Accurate Alternative to Standard Diagnostic Peroral Endoscopy.清醒经鼻内镜检查:一种安全、耐受良好且准确的替代标准诊断经口内镜检查的方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):1937-1947. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07432-9. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic!经鼻内镜检查:无恶心无恐慌!
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;7(4):246-256. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100589. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Oval Cup Forceps Versus Serrated Jaw Forceps in Gastric Biopsy.椭圆形杯状活检钳与锯齿状钳口活检钳在胃活检中的性能特征比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Aug;61(8):2338-2343. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4129-y. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Ultra-thin caliber endoscopes in daily practice: uses for therapeutic application and beyond on the basis of review of 1028 procedures.日常实践中的超薄口径内窥镜:基于1028例手术的回顾探讨其治疗及其他应用
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Oct;3(5):E400-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392363. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Diagnostic utility of small-caliber and conventional endoscopes for gastric cancer and analysis of endoscopic false-negative gastric cancers.小口径内镜和传统内镜对胃癌的诊断效用及内镜检查假阴性胃癌的分析
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep 16;5(9):440-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.440.