Madrid Carlos, Sanz Mariano
Department of Oral Surgery, Oral medicine and Hospital Dentistry, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:87-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01772.x.
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate, analysing the dental literature, whether: * Patients on intravenous (IV) or oral bisphosphonates (BPs) can receive oral implant therapy and what could be the risk of developing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ)? * Osseointegrated implants could be affected by BP therapy.
A Medline search was conducted and all publications fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria from 1966 until December 2008 were included in the review. Moreover, the Cochrane Data Base of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE (from 1980 to December 2008) were searched for English-language articles published between 1966 and 2008. Literature search was completed by a hand research accessing the references cited in all identified publications.
The literature search rendered only one prospective and three retrospective studies. The prospective controlled non-randomized clinical study followed patients with and without BP medication up to 36 months after implant therapy. The patients in the experimental group had been on oral BPs before implant therapy for periods ranging between 1 and 4 years. None of the patients developed BRONJ and implant outcome was not affected by the BP medication. The three selected retrospective studies (two case-controls and one case series) yielded very similar results. All have followed patients on oral BPs after implant therapy, with follow-up ranging between 2 and 4 years. BRONJ was never reported and implant survival rates ranged between 95% and 100%. The literature search on BRONJ including guidelines and recommendations found 59 papers, from which six were retrieved. Among the guidelines, there is a consensus on contraindicating implants in cancer patients under IV-BPs and not contraindicating dental implants in patients under oral-BPs for osteoporosis.
From the analysis of the one prospective and the three retrospective series (217 patients), the placement of an implant may be considered a safe procedure in patients taking oral BPs for <5 years with regard to the occurrence of BRONJ since in these studies no BRONJ has been reported. Moreover, the intake of oral-BPs did not influence short-term (1-4 years) implant survival rates.
本系统评价旨在通过分析牙科文献来评估:
接受静脉注射(IV)或口服双膦酸盐(BP)治疗的患者是否可以接受口腔种植治疗,以及发生双膦酸盐相关颌骨坏死(BRONJ)的风险有多大?
骨整合种植体是否会受到BP治疗的影响?
进行了Medline检索,1966年至2008年12月期间所有符合纳入和排除标准的出版物均纳入本评价。此外,还检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和EMBASE(1980年至2008年12月),以查找1966年至2008年期间发表的英文文章。通过手工检索所有已识别出版物中引用的参考文献来完成文献检索。
文献检索仅找到1项前瞻性研究和3项回顾性研究。这项前瞻性对照非随机临床研究对接受和未接受BP治疗的患者在种植治疗后长达36个月进行了随访。实验组患者在种植治疗前口服BP的时间为1至4年。所有患者均未发生BRONJ,种植结果也未受BP治疗的影响。所选的3项回顾性研究(2项病例对照研究和1项病例系列研究)得出了非常相似的结果。所有研究均对种植治疗后口服BP的患者进行了随访,随访时间为2至4年。从未报告过BRONJ,种植体存活率在95%至100%之间。关于BRONJ的文献检索,包括指南和建议,共找到59篇论文,并从中检索出6篇。在这些指南中,对于接受IV-BP治疗的癌症患者禁忌植入种植体,而对于因骨质疏松接受口服BP治疗的患者不禁忌牙科种植体这一点已达成共识。
通过对1项前瞻性研究和3项回顾性系列研究(217例患者)的分析,对于服用口服BP时间<5年的患者而言,就BRONJ的发生情况而言,种植体植入可被视为一种安全的操作,因为在这些研究中均未报告BRONJ。此外,口服BP的摄入并未影响短期(1至4年)种植体存活率。