Morrow S A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Munschauer F E, Hojnacki D, Benedict R H B
School of Medicine, The Jacobs Neurological Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14203, USA.
Mult Scler. 2009 Aug;15(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1177/1352458509106213.
Studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) report conflicting conclusions regarding fatigue and cognition, which may partly be due to the use of small sample sizes and frequent reliance on a cross-sectional approach.
The ability to distinguish between these two disabling symptoms is necessary in order to properly assess and treat MS patients.
In a retrospective analysis, we assessed the correlation between fatigue and neuropsychological (NP) testing using a cross-sectional (n = 465) and longitudinal approach (n = 69). Cognition was measured using a comprehensive battery called the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS), and fatigue was measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). FSS scores were categorized as normal (<or=4.0), borderline fatigue (4 < FSS < 5.0), and fatigued (>or=5.0). Repeat assessments (n = 69) were categorized as improved or worsened by a change in FSS of either 0.5 or 1.0.
MS patients had significantly higher FSS scores than normal controls (P < 0.001). No correlation was found between FSS and NP scores in either cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses. Fatigue was moderately correlated with depression, assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDIFS) (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). Longitudinally, there was a medium correlation between change in FSS and BDIFS (r = 0.34, P = 0.001), but no significant differences on NP scores using either definition of change.
We conclude that self-reported fatigue, while correlated with self-reported depression, is not significantly related to cognitive capacity in MS.
针对多发性硬化症(MS)的研究在疲劳与认知方面得出了相互矛盾的结论,这可能部分归因于样本量较小以及频繁依赖横断面研究方法。
为了正确评估和治疗MS患者,区分这两种致残症状的能力是必要的。
在一项回顾性分析中,我们采用横断面研究方法(n = 465)和纵向研究方法(n = 69)评估了疲劳与神经心理学(NP)测试之间的相关性。使用一种名为多发性硬化症认知功能最小评估量表(MACFIMS)的综合测试组合来测量认知,并用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)来测量疲劳。FSS评分被分类为正常(≤4.0)、临界疲劳(4 < FSS < 5.0)和疲劳(≥5.0)。重复评估(n = 69)根据FSS变化0.5或1.0被分类为改善或恶化。
MS患者的FSS评分显著高于正常对照组(P < 0.001)。在横断面或纵向分析中,均未发现FSS与NP评分之间存在相关性。使用贝克抑郁量表快速筛查版(BDIFS)评估发现,疲劳与抑郁存在中度相关性(r = 0.44,P < 0.001)。纵向来看,FSS变化与BDIFS之间存在中等相关性(r = 0.34,P = 0.001),但使用任何一种变化定义时,NP评分均无显著差异。
我们得出结论,自我报告的疲劳虽然与自我报告的抑郁相关,但与MS患者的认知能力无显著关联。