Simoni Ricardo Francisco, Cangiani Luiz Marciano, Pereira Antônio Márcio Sanfim Arantes, Abreu Múcio Paranhos, Cangiani Luis Henrique, Zemi Guilherme
Comitê de Anestesia Venosa, SBA.
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):421-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000400004.
Due to its pharmacokinetic characteristics, remifentanil does not promote residual analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of methadone and clonidine in the control of postoperative pain of videolaparoscopic surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled remifentanil infusion.
One hundred and twenty-six patients, ages 18 to 65 years, ASA I and II, of both genders, scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries, participated in this randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled study. After venipuncture, intravenous ketoprofen and dypirone were administered. Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol was used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Before beginning the procedure, an intravenous solution containing 0.1 mg.kg-1 of methadone (methadone group), 2.0 (1/4)g.kg-1 of clonidine (clonidine group), or NS (placebo group) was administered. In the post-anesthetic care unit, postoperative pain was evaluated by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS). Absence of pain was defined as a score < 2, and pain as a score of > 3.
The incidence of pain in the methadone group was significantly lower than in the clonidine and placebo groups (11, 21, and 23, respectively; p < 0.02). Significant differences in the incidence of pain in the placebo and clonidine groups were not observed.
Methadone was more effective than clonidine in the control of postoperative pain in videolaparoscopic surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil; and using clonidine was not better than not using it.
由于瑞芬太尼的药代动力学特性,其在术后即刻不会产生残余镇痛作用。本研究的目的是比较美沙酮和可乐定在靶控输注瑞芬太尼的全静脉麻醉下控制腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的疗效。
126例年龄在18至65岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的男女患者,计划进行腹腔镜手术,参与了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。静脉穿刺后,给予静脉注射酮洛芬和安乃近。采用靶控输注瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导和维持。在手术开始前,给予含有0.1mg·kg-1美沙酮的静脉溶液(美沙酮组)、2.0(1/4)μg·kg-1可乐定的静脉溶液(可乐定组)或生理盐水(安慰剂组)。在麻醉后护理单元,采用视觉模拟评分法(VNS)评估术后疼痛。无痛定义为评分<2分,疼痛定义为评分>3分。
美沙酮组的疼痛发生率显著低于可乐定组和安慰剂组(分别为11、21和23;p<0.02)。未观察到安慰剂组和可乐定组在疼痛发生率上的显著差异。
在靶控输注瑞芬太尼的全静脉麻醉下,美沙酮在控制腹腔镜手术术后疼痛方面比可乐定更有效;使用可乐定并不比不使用更好。