Suppr超能文献

术中使用美沙酮和可乐定对瑞芬太尼术后即刻疼痛控制的疗效

[Efficacy of intraoperative methadone and clonidine in pain control in the immediate postoperative period after the use of remifentanil].

作者信息

Simoni Ricardo Francisco, Cangiani Luiz Marciano, Pereira Antônio Márcio Sanfim Arantes, Abreu Múcio Paranhos, Cangiani Luis Henrique, Zemi Guilherme

机构信息

Comitê de Anestesia Venosa, SBA.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):421-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000400004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Due to its pharmacokinetic characteristics, remifentanil does not promote residual analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of methadone and clonidine in the control of postoperative pain of videolaparoscopic surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled remifentanil infusion.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-six patients, ages 18 to 65 years, ASA I and II, of both genders, scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries, participated in this randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled study. After venipuncture, intravenous ketoprofen and dypirone were administered. Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol was used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Before beginning the procedure, an intravenous solution containing 0.1 mg.kg-1 of methadone (methadone group), 2.0 (1/4)g.kg-1 of clonidine (clonidine group), or NS (placebo group) was administered. In the post-anesthetic care unit, postoperative pain was evaluated by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS). Absence of pain was defined as a score < 2, and pain as a score of > 3.

RESULTS

The incidence of pain in the methadone group was significantly lower than in the clonidine and placebo groups (11, 21, and 23, respectively; p < 0.02). Significant differences in the incidence of pain in the placebo and clonidine groups were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Methadone was more effective than clonidine in the control of postoperative pain in videolaparoscopic surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil; and using clonidine was not better than not using it.

摘要

背景与目的

由于瑞芬太尼的药代动力学特性,其在术后即刻不会产生残余镇痛作用。本研究的目的是比较美沙酮和可乐定在靶控输注瑞芬太尼的全静脉麻醉下控制腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的疗效。

方法

126例年龄在18至65岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的男女患者,计划进行腹腔镜手术,参与了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。静脉穿刺后,给予静脉注射酮洛芬和安乃近。采用靶控输注瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导和维持。在手术开始前,给予含有0.1mg·kg-1美沙酮的静脉溶液(美沙酮组)、2.0(1/4)μg·kg-1可乐定的静脉溶液(可乐定组)或生理盐水(安慰剂组)。在麻醉后护理单元,采用视觉模拟评分法(VNS)评估术后疼痛。无痛定义为评分<2分,疼痛定义为评分>3分。

结果

美沙酮组的疼痛发生率显著低于可乐定组和安慰剂组(分别为11、21和23;p<0.02)。未观察到安慰剂组和可乐定组在疼痛发生率上的显著差异。

结论

在靶控输注瑞芬太尼的全静脉麻醉下,美沙酮在控制腹腔镜手术术后疼痛方面比可乐定更有效;使用可乐定并不比不使用更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验