Suppr超能文献

弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的二线治疗方案。

Second-line treatment paradigms for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

机构信息

Hôpital Saint Louis, Hemato-Oncologie, Institut Universitaire d'Hématologie, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.

出版信息

Curr Oncol Rep. 2009 Sep;11(5):386-93. doi: 10.1007/s11912-009-0052-0.

Abstract

Despite recent major advances in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with dose-intense regimens and the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, a significant proportion of patients will experience early treatment failure, partial response, or relapse after initial chemotherapy. For more than 10 years, the standard treatment for chemosensitive relapses has been based on salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in selected patients. However, several important questions remain: What is the best salvage regimen? What is the efficacy of rituximab in an era when R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is accepted as standard care for frontline therapy? What are the risk factors in second-line therapy? What is the best treatment when high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are not possible? This article reviews all these issues and discusses new biologic therapies, with the knowledge that improvements in outcome may be achieved through a greater understanding of the biologic parameters associated with poorer prognosis.

摘要

尽管最近在使用剂量密集型方案和添加抗 CD20 单克隆抗体利妥昔单抗治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤方面取得了重大进展,但仍有相当一部分患者在初始化疗后会出现早期治疗失败、部分缓解或复发。10 多年来,对化疗敏感的复发患者的标准治疗方法是在挽救化疗后,对选择的患者进行大剂量治疗和自体干细胞移植。然而,仍有几个重要问题亟待解决:最佳挽救方案是什么?在 R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松)被接受为一线治疗标准的时代,利妥昔单抗的疗效如何?二线治疗的风险因素是什么?当无法进行大剂量治疗和自体干细胞移植时,最佳治疗方法是什么?本文回顾了所有这些问题,并讨论了新的生物治疗方法,因为通过更好地了解与预后较差相关的生物学参数,可能会改善治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验