• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你的听诊器上长了什么?(以及你能对此做些什么)。

What's growing on your stethoscope? (And what you can do about it).

作者信息

Schroeder Ariel, Schroeder Maryellen A, D'Amico Frank

机构信息

St. Joseph's High School, Natrona Heights, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 2009 Aug;58(8):404-9.

PMID:19679019
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that rubbing alcohol pads on stethoscope diaphragms can reduce bacterial colonization, but alcohol pads are used infrequently used and not always available.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-blinded study to investigate whether simultaneously scrubbing hands and stethoscope head with alcohol-based hand foam would significantly reduce bacterial counts on the stethoscope. Using their own stethoscope, participants imprinted the stethoscope head onto a chocolate agar plate, then used alcohol-based hand foam to cleanse their hands while simultaneously rubbing the stethoscope head. Once the stethoscope heads were dry, the participants imprinted their stethoscope heads onto a second plate. After 48 hours' incubation, we determined the bacterial counts for the prewash and post-wash plates, and compared the 2.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 184 cultures (from 92 stethoscopes). Both the mean (28 prewash vs 3 post-wash, P=.001) and median (11 prewash vs 1 post-wash, P=.001) colony counts were significantly greater before being cleansed. Three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonies were identified in the prewash period; all were destroyed by the foam. The estimated number of hand washes needed to prevent 1 MRSA colony is 31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-89).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneously using hand foam to clean hands and stethoscope heads reduces bacterial counts on stethoscopes. Further research is needed to determine whether this intervention can reduce morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial infection.

摘要

背景

研究表明,用酒精棉片擦拭听诊器膜片可减少细菌定植,但酒精棉片使用频率不高且并非随时可用。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性单盲研究,以调查用含酒精的洗手液同时清洗双手和听诊器头部是否能显著减少听诊器上的细菌数量。参与者使用自己的听诊器,将听诊器头部按压在巧克力琼脂平板上,然后用含酒精的洗手液洗手,同时擦拭听诊器头部。听诊器头部干燥后,参与者将其再次按压在另一平板上。培养48小时后,我们确定清洗前后平板上的细菌数量,并进行比较。

结果

我们共分析了184份培养物(来自92个听诊器)。清洗前的平均菌落数(28个)和中位数菌落数(11个)均显著高于清洗后(分别为3个和1个,P = 0.001)。清洗前阶段鉴定出3个耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌落;所有这些菌落在清洗过程中均被洗手液消灭。预防1个MRSA菌落所需的洗手次数估计为31次(95%置信区间[CI],18 - 89)。

结论

用洗手液同时清洗双手和听诊器头部可减少听诊器上的细菌数量。需要进一步研究以确定这种干预措施是否能降低与细菌感染相关的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
What's growing on your stethoscope? (And what you can do about it).你的听诊器上长了什么?(以及你能对此做些什么)。
J Fam Pract. 2009 Aug;58(8):404-9.
2
Ethanol-based cleanser versus isopropyl alcohol to decontaminate stethoscopes.基于乙醇的清洁剂与异丙醇用于听诊器消毒的比较
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Apr;37(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.08.006. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
3
A prospective comparative study of the relationship between different types of ring and microbial hand colonization among pediatric intensive care unit nurses.一项关于儿科重症监护病房护士不同类型戒指与手部微生物定植之间关系的前瞻性对照研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Nov;45(11):1572-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 May 13.
4
A strategy to reduce MRSA colonization of stethoscopes.一种减少听诊器耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植的策略。
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Jan;62(1):122-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.03.013. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
5
Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes with antimicrobial diaphragm covers.带有抗菌隔膜套的听诊器的细菌污染情况
Am J Infect Control. 2007 May;35(4):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.09.004.
6
Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the stethoscopes of emergency medical services providers.急诊医疗服务提供者听诊器上耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的患病率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):71-4. doi: 10.1080/10903120802471972.
7
Stethoscope study overlooks bacteria on clinicians' hands.听诊器研究忽视了临床医生手上的细菌。
J Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;58(10):513.
8
Contamination of stethoscopes and physicians' hands after a physical examination.听诊器和医生的手在体检后被污染。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Mar;89(3):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.016.
9
[Bacterial contamination of stethoscopes in hospital].[医院听诊器的细菌污染情况]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2015 Nov-Dec;73(6):723-7. doi: 10.1684/abc.2015.1105.
10
Antimicrobial copper alloys decreased bacteria on stethoscope surfaces.抗菌铜合金减少了听诊器表面的细菌。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jun 1;45(6):642-647. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of bacterial contamination and the effectiveness of UV light-based reprocessing of everyday medical devices.日常医疗设备基于紫外线的清洗再处理的细菌污染分析及其效果评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0268863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268863. eCollection 2022.
2
Disinfection of Stethoscope and Non-Infrared Thermometer: Practices of Physicians in Ethiopia in the Era of COVID-19.听诊器和非红外体温计的消毒:新冠疫情时代埃塞俄比亚医生的做法
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 5;13:3245-3257. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S289125. eCollection 2020.
3
Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review.
听诊器消毒方法:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 13;17(6):1856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061856.
4
Hygiene practices during clinical training: knowledge, attitudes and practice among a cohort of South Asian Medical students.临床培训期间的卫生实践:南亚医学生队列的知识、态度和实践。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 21;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1582-2.
5
Bacteriological assessment of stethoscopes used by healthcare workers in a tertiary care centre of Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理中心医护人员使用的听诊器的细菌学评估。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 28;10(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2677-7.
6
Stethoscope Hygiene: Practice and Attitude of Medical Students.听诊器卫生:医学生的实践与态度
Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(6):509-14. doi: 10.1159/000434753. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
7
Practicability of hygienic wrapping of touchscreen operated mobile devices in a clinical setting.在临床环境中对触摸屏操作的移动设备进行卫生包装的可行性。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 2;9(9):e106445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106445. eCollection 2014.
8
Revisiting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections.重新审视耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染
J Glob Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;2(1):49-56. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.59251.