Suppr超能文献

《白内障国家数据集》55567 例手术的电子多中心审计:外科医生之间后囊破裂率的差异。

The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: variation in posterior capsule rupture rates between surgeons.

机构信息

Gloucestershire Eye Department, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2010 May;24(5):888-93. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.195. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

Abstract

AIMS

To demonstrate variations in posterior capsule rupture (PCR) rate between surgeons of the same and different grades as a by-product of routine clinical care.

METHOD

NHS departments using electronic medical record (EMR) systems to collect the Cataract National Dataset (CND) were invited to submit data. Data were remotely extracted, anonymised, assessed for conformity and completeness, and analysed for rates of PCR for individual surgeons within each of the three grades.

RESULTS

Data were extracted on 55,567 cataract operations performed at 12 NHS trusts by 406 surgeons between November 2001 and July 2006. Data on the grade of 404 of the 406 surgeons who contributed to the study were available for 55,515 cases (99.9%) and were used for this analysis. Variation in PCR rate between surgeons was highest for the most junior grade of surgeon and between those surgeons contributing relatively few cases to the data set. Variation in PCR was lowest among experienced surgeons contributing large numbers of cases to the data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable variation in PCR rate exists both between and within surgical grades. Routine electronic collection of the CND allows detailed analysis of variations in PCR rates between individual surgeons. To define acceptable limits for this benchmark complication of cataract surgery, further work is needed to adjust surgeons' outcomes for the case mix complexity.

摘要

目的

展示同一级别和不同级别的外科医生之间后囊膜破裂(PCR)率的差异,这是常规临床护理的附带结果。

方法

邀请使用电子病历(EMR)系统收集白内障国家数据集(CND)的NHS 部门提交数据。远程提取、匿名化、评估一致性和完整性,并分析每位外科医生在三个级别内的 PCR 率。

结果

从 2001 年 11 月至 2006 年 7 月,在 12 家 NHS 信托基金进行了 55567 例白内障手术,由 406 名外科医生进行。在为该研究做出贡献的 406 名外科医生中,有 404 名的手术级别数据可用于 55515 例(99.9%),并用于此分析。在最年轻的外科医生级别和对数据集贡献相对较少病例的外科医生之间,PCR 率的变化最大。在为数据集贡献大量病例的经验丰富的外科医生之间,PCR 的变化最小。

结论

PCR 率在外科医生之间和内部都存在相当大的差异。常规电子收集 CND 允许对个别外科医生的 PCR 率变化进行详细分析。为了定义白内障手术这种基准并发症的可接受范围,需要进一步调整外科医生的病例组合复杂性结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验