Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Nov;84(4):617-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00089.x. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
The extent to which interspecific interference competition has contributed to character evolution is one of the most neglected problems in evolutionary biology. When formerly allopatric species come into secondary contact, aggressive interactions between the species can cause selection on traits that affect interspecific encounter rates (e.g. habitat preferences, activity schedules), competitor recognition (e.g. colouration, song), and fighting ability (e.g. weaponry, body size). We define agonistic character displacement (ACD) as the process of phenotypic evolution in a population caused by interference competition with one or more sympatric species and which results in shifts in traits that affect the rate, intensity or outcome of interspecific aggression. After clarifying the relationships between ACD and other evolutionary processes that may occur when species come into secondary contact, we develop an individual-based, quantitative genetic model to examine how traits involved in competitor recognition would be expected to evolve under different secondary contact scenarios. Our simulation results show that both divergence and convergence are possible outcomes, depending on the intensity of interspecific exploitative competition, the costs associated with mutual versus unilateral recognition, and the extent of phenotypic differences prior to secondary contact. We then devise a set of eight criteria for evaluating putative examples of ACD and review the empirical literature to assess the strength of existing evidence and to identify promising avenues for future research. Our literature search revealed 33 putative examples of ACD across insects, fishes, bats, birds, lizards, and amphibians (15 divergence examples; 18 convergence examples). Only one example satisfies all eight criteria for demonstrating ACD, but most case studies satisfy four or more criteria. The current state of the evidence for ACD is similar to the state of the evidence for ecological character displacement just 10 years ago. We conclude by offering suggestions for further theoretical and empirical research on ACD.
种间干扰竞争在多大程度上促进了特征进化是进化生物学中最被忽视的问题之一。当以前的异域物种进入次要接触时,物种之间的攻击性相互作用会导致对影响种间相遇率的特征的选择(例如,栖息地偏好、活动时间表)、竞争识别(例如,颜色、歌曲)和战斗能力(例如,武器、体型)。我们将竞争特征位移(ACD)定义为由于与一个或多个同域物种的干扰竞争而导致种群表型进化的过程,其结果是导致影响种间攻击的速率、强度或结果的特征发生变化。在澄清 ACD 与其他当物种进入次要接触时可能发生的进化过程之间的关系之后,我们开发了一个基于个体的定量遗传模型,以研究在不同的次要接触情景下,与竞争识别相关的特征如何进化。我们的模拟结果表明,取决于种间掠夺性竞争的强度、相互识别与单方面识别相关的成本以及次要接触前的表型差异程度,既可能出现分歧,也可能出现趋同。然后,我们设计了一套用于评估假定的 ACD 示例的八个标准,并审查了实证文献,以评估现有证据的强度,并确定未来研究的有希望的途径。我们的文献搜索揭示了昆虫、鱼类、蝙蝠、鸟类、蜥蜴和两栖动物中 33 个假定的 ACD 示例(15 个分歧示例;18 个趋同示例)。只有一个示例满足证明 ACD 的所有八个标准,但大多数案例研究满足四个或更多标准。ACD 的证据现状与 10 年前生态特征位移的证据现状相似。最后,我们提出了进一步研究 ACD 的理论和实证研究的建议。