• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

铸造合金与激光焊接钛覆盖义齿杆之间的被动性比较。

Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2009 Dec;18(8):656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00504.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00504.x
PMID:19682220
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the fit of cast alloy overdenture and laser-welded titanium-alloy bars by measuring induced strain upon tightening of the bars on a master cast as well as a function of screw tightening sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four implant analogs were secured into Type IV dental stone to simulate a mandibular edentulous patient cast, and two groups of four overdenture bars were fabricated. Group I was four cast alloy bars and Group II was four laser-welded titanium bars. The cast alloy bars included Au-Ag-Pd, Pd-Ag-Au, Au-Ag-Cu-Pd, and Ag-Pd-Cu-Au, while the laser-welded bars were all Ti-Al-V alloy. Bars were made from the same master cast, were torqued into place, and the total strain in the bars was measured through five strain gauges bonded to the bar between the implants. Each bar was placed and torqued 27 times to 30 Ncm per screw using three tightening sequences. Data were processed through a strain amplifier and analyzed by computer using StrainSmart software. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between alloy types. Laser-welded titanium bars tended to have lower strains than corresponding cast bars, although the Au-Ag-Pd bar was not significantly different. The magnitudes of total strain were the least when first tightening the ends of the bar.

CONCLUSIONS

The passivity of implant overdenture bars was evaluated using total strain of the bar when tightening. Selecting a high modulus of elasticity cast alloy or use of laser-welded bar design resulted in the lowest average strain magnitudes. While the effect of screw tightening sequence was minimal, tightening the distal ends first demonstrated the lowest strain, and hence the best passivity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过测量杆拧紧时在主模型上产生的诱导应变以及拧紧顺序的函数来研究铸造合金义齿和激光焊接钛合金杆的适配性。

材料和方法

将四个种植体模拟体固定在 IV 型牙科石膏中,以模拟下颌无牙患者的模型,然后制造两组四个义齿杆。组 I 为四个铸造合金杆,组 II 为四个激光焊接钛合金杆。铸造合金杆包括 Au-Ag-Pd、Pd-Ag-Au、Au-Ag-Cu-Pd 和 Ag-Pd-Cu-Au,而激光焊接杆均为 Ti-Al-V 合金。这些杆是由同一个母模铸造的,然后拧到位,并通过粘在种植体之间的杆上的五个应变计测量杆中的总应变。每个杆都用三个拧紧顺序拧到 30 Ncm 扭矩位置 27 次。数据通过应变放大器处理,并使用 StrainSmart 软件通过计算机进行分析。数据通过方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验进行分析。

结果

发现合金类型之间存在显著差异。激光焊接钛合金杆的应变往往低于相应的铸造杆,尽管 Au-Ag-Pd 杆没有显著差异。当第一次拧紧杆的两端时,总应变的幅度最小。

结论

使用拧紧时杆的总应变来评估种植体义齿杆的被动性。选择高弹性模量的铸造合金或使用激光焊接杆设计可导致最低的平均应变幅度。尽管拧紧顺序的影响很小,但首先拧紧远端显示出最低的应变,从而具有最佳的被动性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars.铸造合金与激光焊接钛覆盖义齿杆之间的被动性比较。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Dec;18(8):656-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00504.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
2
Passive fit of frameworks in titanium and palladium-silver alloy submitted the laser welding.在经过激光焊接的钛和钯银合金中,框架的被动适配情况。
J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Feb;35(2):123-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01218.x.
3
Comparative study on torsional strength, ductility and fracture characteristics of laser-welded alpha+beta Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy, CP Titanium and Co-Cr alloy dental castings.激光焊接α+β钛-6铝-7铌合金、纯钛及钴铬合金牙科铸件的抗扭强度、延展性和断裂特性的对比研究
Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
4
Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution.垂直不匹配的覆盖义齿固位杆的材料对三维应力分布的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):425-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00612.x. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
5
Fit of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy crowns before and after marginal refinement by electrical discharge machining.通过放电加工进行边缘细化前后商业纯钛和Ti-6Al-4V合金牙冠的适配性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):467-72. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128954.
6
In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.用于粘结固位种植体支持的局部义齿的铸造支架体外垂直不匹配评估。
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
7
Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report.种植体覆盖义齿杆失效的扫描电子显微镜观察:病例系列报告。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):26-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00127.x.
8
Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.早期种植体支持的无牙颌激光焊接钛支架修复:15 年的随访研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):311-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00119.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
9
A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.两种制作种植修复体支架方法的适合度准确性比较。
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):125-31.
10
In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.种植体支持的螺丝固位局部义齿边缘适合性的体外研究
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 May;31(5):477-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01271.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of full arch two scanning techniques on the accuracy of overdenture conventional and CAD/CAM Co-Cr bars.全牙弓两种扫描技术对覆盖义齿传统钴铬合金杆及CAD/CAM钴铬合金杆精度的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Nov;34(7):553-564. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 28.