Suppr超能文献

腹腔内压在以医学为主的重症监护病房中的应用

Usefulness of intra-abdominal pressure in a predominantly medical intensive care unit.

机构信息

Intensive Care Department, Hospital and University Complex, 02006 Albacete, Spain.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2010 Mar;25(1):175.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.05.017. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The deleterious effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) have been known for more than a century. The proposed objectives were to measure changes in IAP and analyze increase-related factors and complications and whether high IAP and its persistence are related to complications and mortality in a predominantly medical intensive care unit.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, we conducted a prospective cohort study in which IAP was measured using the bladder method. Hospitalization time, demographic variables, diagnosis on admission, APACHE II score, and clinical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were studied. Overall mean IAP was 12.3 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7-13), and on the first day, 12.68 mm Hg (SD, 5.32; 95% CI, 11.8-13.6); maximum IAP was 16.4 mm Hg (SD, 4.6; 95% CI, 15.6-17.2). A positive correlation was found between IAP, APACHE (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation) II, and age. Higher IAP values were independently associated with higher age, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, need for dialysis, and intolerance to enteral feeding. The value showing the best sensitivity and specificity in predicting mortality was persistence of IAP 20 mm Hg or greater for 4 days or more. The number of days with IAP 20 mm Hg or greater was a factor associated with a higher risk of death (odds ratio, 2.3). Patients who died showed a tendency to increased IAP.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a threshold IAP of 20 mm Hg and its permanence over time were the best predictive factors of complications and mortality. Among other relationships, we also observed that older patients had higher IAP. High IAP was a cause of intolerance to enteral nutrition.

摘要

背景

一个多世纪以来,人们已经认识到腹腔内压升高的有害影响。本研究旨在测量腹腔内压的变化,并分析其升高的相关因素和并发症,以及高腹腔内压及其持续存在是否与主要为内科重症监护病房的并发症和死亡率相关。

方法

在为期 1 年的时间里,我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,使用膀胱法测量腹腔内压。记录住院时间、人口统计学变量、入院诊断、急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分和临床并发症。

结果

共研究了 130 例患者。总体平均腹腔内压为 12.3mmHg(标准差 [SD],3.79;95%置信区间 [CI],11.7-13),第 1 天为 12.68mmHg(SD,5.32;95%CI,11.8-13.6);最大腹腔内压为 16.4mmHg(SD,4.6;95%CI,15.6-17.2)。发现腹腔内压与急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分和年龄呈正相关。较高的腹腔内压值与较高的年龄、延长的活化部分凝血活酶时间、需要透析和不能耐受肠内喂养独立相关。在预测死亡率方面,腹腔内压持续 4 天或以上 20mmHg 或更高显示出最佳的敏感性和特异性。腹腔内压 20mmHg 或更高的天数是与死亡风险增加相关的因素(比值比,2.3)。死亡患者的腹腔内压有升高的趋势。

结论

在这项研究中,20mmHg 的阈值腹腔内压及其持续时间是并发症和死亡率的最佳预测因素。在其他关系中,我们还观察到老年患者的腹腔内压较高。高腹腔内压是不耐受肠内营养的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验