Kronbak Lone Grønbaek, Nielsen J Rasmus, Jørgensen Ole A, Vestergaard Niels
Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.
J Environ Manage. 2009 Aug;90(11):3665-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
The paper develops a biological-economic evaluation tool to analyse the consequences for trawl fishers of implementing more selective fishing technologies. This is done by merging a dynamic biological population model and an economic cost-benefit evaluation framework to describe the consequences for the fish stocks, fishermen and society. The bio-economic evaluation is applied to the case of the Danish trawl fishery in Kattegat and Skagerrak, which experiences a high level of discards and bycatches of several species. Four different kinds of selectivity scenarios are evaluated in comparison with a baseline. The results from the evaluation are indicators for the consequences on ecological and economic levels. The results show that implementation of different selective fishing gear in the Kattegat and Skagerrak mixed trawl fisheries generally implies a trade off over time between rebuilding the stocks and economic loss. Moreover, the analysis shows that implementation of more selective gear is not always beneficial.
本文开发了一种生物经济评估工具,以分析采用更具选择性的捕捞技术对拖网渔民的影响。这是通过将动态生物种群模型与经济成本效益评估框架相结合来实现的,以描述对鱼类种群、渔民和社会的影响。该生物经济评估应用于卡特加特海峡和斯卡格拉克海峡的丹麦拖网渔业案例,该渔业存在多种鱼类的大量弃鱼和兼捕情况。与基线相比,评估了四种不同的选择性情景。评估结果是生态和经济层面影响的指标。结果表明,在卡特加特海峡和斯卡格拉克海峡的混合拖网渔业中实施不同的选择性渔具,通常意味着在恢复种群数量和经济损失之间随着时间的推移进行权衡。此外,分析表明,采用更具选择性的渔具并不总是有益的。