Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3150, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2009 Dec;87(12):4173-80. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1737. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Assimilating accurate behavioral events over a long period can be labor-intensive and relatively expensive. If an automatic device could accurately record the duration and frequency for a given behavioral event, it would be a valuable alternative to the traditional use of human observers for behavioral studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the accuracy in the time spent at the waterer and the number of visits to the waterer by individually housed nursery pigs between human observers scoring video files using Observer software (OBS) and an automatic water meter Hobo (WM, control) affixed onto the waterline. Eleven PIC USA genotype gilts (22 +/- 2 d of age; 6.5 +/- 1.4 kg of BW) were housed individually in pens with ad libitum access to a corn-based starter ration and one nipple waterer. Behavior was collected on d 0 (day of weaning), 7, and 14 of the trial using 1 color camera positioned over 4 attached pens and a RECO-204 DVR at 1 frame per second. For the OBS method, 2 experienced observers recorded drinking behavior from the video files, which was defined as when the gilt placed her mouth over the nipple waterer. Data were analyzed using nonparametric methods and the general linear model and regression procedures in SAS. The experimental unit was the individual pen housing 1 gilt. The GLM model included the method of observation (WM vs. OBS) and time (24 h) as variables, and the gilt nested within method was used as the error term. Gilts consumed more water (P = 0.04) on d 14 than on d 0. The time of day affected (P < 0.001) the number of visits and the time spent at the waterer regardless of the method. However, the OBS method underestimated (P < 0.001) the number of visits to the waterer (3.48 +/- 0.33 visits/h for OBS vs. 4.94 +/- 0.33 for WM) and overestimated (P < 0.001) the time spent at the waterer (22.6 +/- 1.46 s/h for OBS vs. 13.9 +/- 1.43 for WM) compared with WM. The relationship between the 2 methods for prediction of time spent at the waterer and number of visits made by the gilts was weak (R(2) = 0.56 and 0.69, respectively). Collectively, these data indicate that the use of the traditional OBS method for quantifying drinking behavior in pigs can be misleading. Quantifying drinking behavior and perhaps other behavioral events via the OBS method must be more accurately validated.
长时间内准确记录行为事件可能既费力又昂贵。如果有一种自动设备能够准确记录特定行为事件的持续时间和频率,那么它将成为行为研究中传统使用人类观察者的有价值替代品。因此,本研究的目的是确定个体饲养的仔猪在水培器上花费的时间和访问水培器的次数,方法是使用 Observer 软件 (OBS) 对视频文件进行评分的人类观察者与固定在供水管线上的自动水表 Hobo (WM,对照) 进行比较。11 头 PIC USA 基因型母猪(22 +/- 2 日龄;6.5 +/- 1.4 公斤 BW)单独饲养在有自由采食玉米基础起始日粮和一个奶嘴式饮水器的围栏中。在试验的第 0 天(断奶日)、第 7 天和第 14 天,使用一个定位在 4 个连接围栏上方的彩色摄像机和一个 RECO-204 DVR,以每秒 1 帧的速度收集行为数据。对于 OBS 方法,2 名经验丰富的观察者从视频文件中记录饮水行为,这被定义为母猪将嘴放在奶嘴式饮水器上的时候。使用非参数方法和 SAS 中的一般线性模型和回归程序分析数据。实验单位是单独饲养 1 头母猪的围栏。GLM 模型包括观察方法(WM 与 OBS)和时间(24 小时)作为变量,方法嵌套在母猪中作为误差项。母猪在第 14 天比第 0 天消耗更多的水(P = 0.04)。无论方法如何,一天中的时间都影响(P < 0.001)访问次数和在水培器上花费的时间。然而,OBS 方法低估了(P < 0.001)母猪访问水培器的次数(OBS 为 3.48 +/- 0.33 次/小时,WM 为 4.94 +/- 0.33 次/小时),高估了(P < 0.001)在水培器上花费的时间(OBS 为 22.6 +/- 1.46 秒/小时,WM 为 13.9 +/- 1.43 秒/小时)。与 WM 相比,两种方法之间用于预测母猪在水培器上花费的时间和访问次数的关系较弱(R(2)分别为 0.56 和 0.69)。综上所述,这些数据表明,传统的 OBS 方法用于量化猪的饮水行为可能会产生误导。通过 OBS 方法量化饮水行为甚至其他行为事件必须进行更准确的验证。