The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):2362-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546509340633. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is an uncommon but devastating event after reconstruction, and risk factors for graft failure are not well understood.
Returning to a high activity level after ACL reconstruction and use of an allograft are risk factors for ACL graft failure.
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Twenty-one patients with ACL graft failure were identified over a 2-year period. Forty-two age- and sex-matched controls were identified over the same period. A 1:2 matched case-control design was used to evaluate activity level after reconstruction and graft type as risk factors for ACL graft failure. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine odds ratios for activity level after reconstruction and for graft type among cases and controls. Association (interaction) between activity level after reconstruction and graft type was evaluated comparing stratum-specific odds ratios.
Univariate logistic regression models showed an increased odds of ACL graft failure for those with high activity level compared with low activity level (odds ratio [OR], 5.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-28.61; P = .03) and for allografts compared with autografts (OR, 5.56; 95% CI 1.55-19.98; P = .009). A bivariate logistic regression model showed a 35% change in the odds ratio for activity level (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 0.89-21.16; P = .07) and a 13% change in the odds ratio for allograft compared with autograft (OR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.34-18.20; P = .02). Stratum-specific odds ratios between activity level and graft type show a multiplicative interaction between higher activity level and allograft for much greater odds of ACL graft failure.
Higher activity level after reconstruction and allograft use for reconstruction are risk factors for ACL graft failure. Stratum-specific odds ratios show a multiplicative interaction between higher activity level after ACL reconstruction and allograft use, greatly increasing the odds for ACL graft failure.
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后发生移植物失败是一种罕见但破坏性的事件,其失败的风险因素尚不清楚。
ACL 重建后恢复高活动水平和使用同种异体移植物是 ACL 移植物失败的危险因素。
病例对照研究;证据水平,3 级。
在 2 年期间确定了 21 例 ACL 移植物失败患者。在同一时期确定了 42 例年龄和性别匹配的对照者。使用 1:2 匹配病例对照设计,评估重建后活动水平和移植物类型作为 ACL 移植物失败的危险因素。使用逻辑回归分析确定病例和对照组中重建后活动水平和移植物类型的优势比。评估重建后活动水平与移植物类型之间的关联(相互作用),比较分层特异性优势比。
单变量逻辑回归模型显示,与低活动水平相比,高活动水平的 ACL 移植物失败的可能性更高(比值比 [OR],5.53;95%置信区间 [CI],1.18-28.61;P =.03),同种异体移植物比自体移植物的可能性更高(OR,5.56;95%CI 1.55-19.98;P =.009)。双变量逻辑回归模型显示,活动水平的比值比变化了 35%(OR,4.33;95%CI,0.89-21.16;P =.07),同种异体移植物与自体移植物的比值比变化了 13%(OR,4.93;95%CI,1.34-18.20;P =.02)。活动水平与移植物类型之间的分层特异性优势比显示,ACL 重建后更高的活动水平与同种异体移植物之间存在乘法相互作用,大大增加了 ACL 移植物失败的可能性。
重建后更高的活动水平和同种异体移植物的使用是 ACL 移植物失败的危险因素。分层特异性优势比显示,ACL 重建后更高的活动水平与同种异体移植物的使用之间存在乘法相互作用,大大增加了 ACL 移植物失败的可能性。