Laposa Judith M, Rector Neil A
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Aug;197(8):599-605. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b0be76.
The current study examined the extent to which patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) demonstrate cognitive biases to OCD symptom or inflated responsibility threat cues. Participants with either primary contamination-washing or doubting/harming-checking OCD, non-OCD anxiety disorders, and student controls completed a primed lexical decision task. Following either neutral or OCD-threat priming conditions, participants made lexical decisions regarding different sets of word stimuli: nonwords, OCD symptoms, OCD inflated responsibility, and depression. Following the OCD primes, the primary contamination-washing symptom subgroup showed increased interference on OCD symptom words compared with the harming symptom and student groups. The primary contamination-washing subgroup also showed increased interference on responsibility words compared with the harming, non-OCD anxious and student groups. However, subsidiary analyses comparing patients with contamination obsessions with and without associated fears of harming others through the spreading of contaminants, demonstrated that it was the latter group that evidenced cognitive biases to responsibility threat cues. These results are considered in relation to cognitive models of OCD.
当前研究考察了强迫症(OCD)患者对强迫症症状或夸大责任威胁线索表现出认知偏差的程度。患有原发性污染清洗型或怀疑/伤害检查型强迫症的参与者、非强迫症焦虑症患者以及学生对照组完成了一项启动词汇判断任务。在中性或强迫症威胁启动条件之后,参与者对不同组的单词刺激进行词汇判断:非单词、强迫症症状、强迫症夸大责任以及抑郁相关词汇。在强迫症启动之后,原发性污染清洗症状亚组与伤害症状组和学生组相比,对强迫症症状词汇的干扰增加。原发性污染清洗亚组与伤害组、非强迫症焦虑组和学生组相比,对责任相关词汇的干扰也增加。然而,辅助分析比较了有和没有因污染物传播而伤害他人相关恐惧的污染强迫观念患者,结果表明,正是后一组表现出对责任威胁线索的认知偏差。结合强迫症的认知模型对这些结果进行了探讨。