Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰小儿癫痫持续状态的急诊管理:临床实践指南背景下的实践模式

Emergency management of paediatric status epilepticus in Australia and New Zealand: practice patterns in the context of clinical practice guidelines.

作者信息

Babl Franz E, Sheriff Nisa, Borland Meredith, Acworth Jason, Neutze Jocelyn, Krieser David, Ngo Peter, Schutz Jacquie, Thomson Fiona, Cotterell Elizabeth, Jamison Sarah, Francis Peter

机构信息

Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Sep;45(9):541-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01536.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

Abstract

AIMS

To establish current acute seizure management through a review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and reported physician management in the 11 largest paediatric emergency departments in Australia (n= 9) and New Zealand (n= 2) within the Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) network, and to compare this with Advanced Paediatric Life Support (APLS) guidelines and existing evidence.

METHODS

(i) Review of CPGs for acute seizure management at PREDICT sites. (ii) A standardised anonymous survey of senior emergency doctors at PREDICT sites investigating management of status epilepticus (SE).

RESULTS

Ten sites used seven different seizure CPGs. One site had no seizure CPG. First line management was with benzodiazepines (10 sites). Second line and subsequent management included phenytoin (10), phenobarbitone (10), thiopentone (9), paraldehyde (6) and midazolam infusion (5). Of 83 available consultants, 78 (94%) responded. First line management of SE without intravenous (IV) access included diazepam per rectum (PR) (49%), and midazolam intramuscular (41%) and via the buccal route (9%). First line management of SE with IV access included midazolam IV (50%) and diazepam IV (44%). The second line agent was phenytoin (88%); third line agents were phenobarbitone (33%), thiopentone and intubation (32%), paraldehyde PR (22%) and midazolam infusion (6%). Fourth line agents were thiopentone and intubation (60%), phenobarbitone (16%), midazolam infusion (13%) and paraldehyde (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial seizure management by CPG recommendations and reported physician practice was broadly similar across PREDICT sites and consistent with APLS guidelines. Practice was variable for second/third line SE management. Areas of controversy would benefit from multi-centred trials.

摘要

目的

通过回顾临床实践指南(CPG)以及澳大利亚9个和新西兰2个最大的儿科急诊科(共11个)在国际儿科急诊科研究协作组(PREDICT)网络中的医生报告管理情况,来确立当前急性癫痫发作的管理方法,并将其与高级儿科生命支持(APLS)指南及现有证据进行比较。

方法

(i)回顾PREDICT研究点的急性癫痫发作管理CPG。(ii)对PREDICT研究点的高级急诊医生进行标准化匿名调查,以调查癫痫持续状态(SE)的管理情况。

结果

10个研究点使用了7种不同的癫痫发作CPG。1个研究点没有癫痫发作CPG。一线治疗使用苯二氮䓬类药物(10个研究点)。二线及后续治疗包括苯妥英(10个研究点)、苯巴比妥(10个研究点)、硫喷妥钠(9个研究点)、副醛(6个研究点)和咪达唑仑静脉输注(5个研究点)。在83名可供咨询的医生中,78名(94%)做出了回应。无静脉通路时SE的一线治疗包括直肠给予地西泮(49%)、肌肉注射咪达唑仑(41%)和经颊给药(9%)。有静脉通路时SE的一线治疗包括静脉注射咪达唑仑(50%)和静脉注射地西泮(44%)。二线药物是苯妥英(88%);三线药物是苯巴比妥(33%)、硫喷妥钠和插管(32%)、直肠给予副醛(22%)和咪达唑仑静脉输注(6%)。四线药物是硫喷妥钠和插管(60%)、苯巴比妥(16%)、咪达唑仑静脉输注(13%)和副醛(9%)。

结论

在PREDICT研究点,CPG建议和报告的医生实践中的初始癫痫发作管理大致相似,且与APLS指南一致。二线/三线SE管理的实践存在差异。有争议的领域将受益于多中心试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验