Suppr超能文献

顺势个体化 Q-潜能疗法与氟西汀治疗中重度抑郁症的双盲、随机非劣效性试验。

Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Homeopathy Graduation Programme, Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, R. Napoleão de Barros, 925 São Paulo, SP 04024-002, Brazil.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:520182. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep114. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Abstract

Homeopathy is a complementary and integrative medicine used in depression, The aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority and tolerability of individualized homeopathic medicines [Quinquagintamillesmial (Q-potencies)] in acute depression, using fluoxetine as active control. Ninety-one outpatients with moderate to severe depression were assigned to receive an individualized homeopathic medicine or fluoxetine 20 mg day(-1) (up to 40 mg day(-1)) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind double-dummy 8-week, single-center trial. Primary efficacy measure was the analysis of the mean change in the Montgomery & Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression scores, using a non-inferiority test with margin of 1.45. Secondary efficacy outcomes were response and remission rates. Tolerability was assessed with the side effect rating scale of the Scandinavian Society of Psychopharmacology. Mean MADRS scores differences were not significant at the 4th (P = .654) and 8th weeks (P = .965) of treatment. Non-inferiority of homeopathy was indicated because the upper limit of the confidence interval (CI) for mean difference in MADRS change was less than the non-inferiority margin: mean differences (homeopathy-fluoxetine) were -3.04 (95% CI -6.95, 0.86) and -2.4 (95% CI -6.05, 0.77) at 4th and 8th week, respectively. There were no significant differences between the percentages of response or remission rates in both groups. Tolerability: there were no significant differences between the side effects rates, although a higher percentage of patients treated with fluoxetine reported troublesome side effects and there was a trend toward greater treatment interruption for adverse effects in the fluoxetine group. This study illustrates the feasibility of randomized controlled double-blind trials of homeopathy in depression and indicates the non-inferiority of individualized homeopathic Q-potencies as compared to fluoxetine in acute treatment of outpatients with moderate to severe depression.

摘要

顺势疗法是一种用于治疗抑郁症的补充和综合医学。本研究旨在探讨个体化顺势疗法药物[Quinquagintamillesmial(Q 潜能)]在急性抑郁症中的非劣效性和耐受性,以氟西汀作为活性对照。91 名中度至重度抑郁症患者被分配接受个体化顺势疗法药物或氟西汀 20mg/天(最高 40mg/天),为期 8 周的前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、单中心试验。主要疗效指标是使用 1.45 的边际进行非劣效性检验的蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)抑郁评分的平均变化分析。次要疗效结果是反应和缓解率。耐受性通过斯堪的纳维亚精神药理学协会的副作用评定量表进行评估。治疗第 4 周(P=0.654)和第 8 周(P=0.965)时,MADRS 评分差异无统计学意义。由于 MADRS 变化的平均差值置信区间(CI)上限小于非劣效性边界:第 4 周和第 8 周时,差异分别为-3.04(95%CI-6.95,0.86)和-2.4(95%CI-6.05,0.77),表明顺势疗法的非劣效性。两组的反应或缓解率百分比没有显著差异。耐受性:两组之间的副作用发生率没有显著差异,尽管接受氟西汀治疗的患者报告有更多的麻烦副作用,并且氟西汀组因不良反应中断治疗的趋势更大。本研究说明了在抑郁症中进行随机对照双盲试验的可行性,并表明个体化顺势疗法 Q 潜能在治疗中度至重度抑郁症门诊患者的急性治疗中与氟西汀相比具有非劣效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/3136538/17e478ad1a2a/ECAM2011-520182.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验