Suppr超能文献

健康计划在签约政策中对外科医生和非外科专科医生的委员会认证及再认证的使用情况。

Health plan use of board certification and recertification of surgeons and nonsurgical subspecialists in contracting policies.

作者信息

Freed Gary L, Dunham Kelly M, Singer Dianne

机构信息

University of Michigan, 300 N Ingalls St, Bldg 6E08, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0456, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2009 Aug;144(8):753-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.128.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the role of board certification in general surgeon, surgical specialist, and nonsurgical subspecialist credentialing and contracting policies and to examine possible variation among different types of health plans.

DESIGN

Telephone survey conducted from October 27, 2006, through March 30, 2007.

SETTING

Health plans across the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Health plan credentialing personnel from a random sample of 223 health plans stratified by enrollment size, plan type, Medicaid enrollment, and tax status.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of health plans that require specialty board certification at initial contract or at some point during association with the plan and health plan requirements for recertification.

RESULTS

Of 223 health plans, 9 were ineligible, and credentialing personnel completed the telephone survey in 176, which resulted in an overall response rate of 82%. More than 60% of the health plans in this study did not require surgical specialists, general surgeons, or nonsurgical subspecialists ever to be board certified to contract with the plan. Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported that they did not require surgeons (65%) or nonsurgical subspecialists (63%) with time-limited board certification to recertify in their specialty. More than half of the health plans reported that they made exceptions to their board certification policies based on geographic or network need.

CONCLUSIONS

Most health plans did not use specialty board certification to assess surgeon and nonsurgical subspecialist competence.

摘要

目的

描述普通外科医生、外科专科医生和非外科亚专科医生的委员会认证在资格认定及签约政策中的作用,并研究不同类型健康计划之间可能存在的差异。

设计

2006年10月27日至2007年3月30日进行的电话调查。

地点

美国各地的健康计划。

参与者

从223个按参保人数、计划类型、医疗补助参保情况和税务状况分层的健康计划中随机抽取的健康计划资格认定人员。

主要观察指标

在初次签约时或与计划关联的某个时间点要求专科委员会认证的健康计划比例,以及健康计划对重新认证的要求。

结果

223个健康计划中,9个不符合条件,资格认定人员在176个计划中完成了电话调查,总体回复率为82%。本研究中超过60%的健康计划不要求外科专科医生、普通外科医生或非外科亚专科医生获得委员会认证即可与计划签约。约三分之二的受访者表示,他们不要求有时间限制的委员会认证的外科医生(65%)或非外科亚专科医生(63%)在其专科进行重新认证。超过一半的健康计划表示,基于地理或网络需求,他们对委员会认证政策有例外规定。

结论

大多数健康计划未使用专科委员会认证来评估外科医生和非外科亚专科医生的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验