Al-Ahaideb Abdulaziz, Quinn Andrew, Smith Erin, Yach Jeffrey, Ellis Randy, Pichora David
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Saud University and King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Comput Aided Surg. 2009;14(4-6):123-6. doi: 10.3109/10929080903194727.
A laboratory study was conducted to compare the accuracy with which a LISS plate could be placed on the distal metaphysis of a model femur using both a fluoroscopy-based computer assisted technique and the conventional fluoroscopic technique. A significant difference was found between outcomes with the two approaches with respect to the maximum distance from the plate to the diaphysis of the bone, but there was no significant difference in the maximum distance to the condylar area. There was also no difference with respect to the number of holes that required re-drilling for adjustment of the plate placement or screws with poor purchase in bone. There were, however, significant differences between the two techniques in terms of duration of the procedure and radiation exposure.
进行了一项实验室研究，以比较使用基于荧光透视的计算机辅助技术和传统荧光透视技术将LISS钢板放置在模型股骨远端干骺端时的准确性。在钢板到骨干的最大距离方面，两种方法的结果存在显著差异，但到髁区的最大距离没有显著差异。在调整钢板位置或骨内固定不佳的螺钉时，需要重新钻孔的孔数方面也没有差异。然而，在手术持续时间和辐射暴露方面，两种技术之间存在显著差异。
