Ademi Zanfina, Liew Danny, Chew Derek, Conner Greg, Shiel Louise, Nelson Mark, Soman Ash, Steg Gabriel, Bhatt Deepak L, Reid Christopher
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Monash University, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 Fall;27(3):164-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2009.00090.x.
Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme supports the use of effective drugs for the prevention and control of cardiovascular risk factors. However, there are little data available describing per person costs of medication in primary prevention and secondary prevention in the community. We aim to understand annual expenditure on cardiovascular medicines according to the level and extent of cardiovascular disease, using participants enrolled in the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. 2873 participants were recruited into the REACH registry through 273 Australian general practices. Cardiovascular medicines review was undertaken at baseline. Average weighted costs of medications were estimated using government-reimbursed prices. Annual costs were stratified by disease extent and location. The annual mean cost of pharmaceuticals per person was 1307 AU dollars. The average reported medicine use per person across all states and participants groups varied significantly. Participants with cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease were prescribed less cardiovascular medication than those with coronary artery disease (CAD) (mean number of drugs 3.5 vs. 4.5, P < 0.0001) and (3.6 vs. 4.5, P < 0.0001), while those with risk factor alone had the same medication use as those with CAD (mean number 4.5). Medication use was lower in Western Australia in comparison to eastern States. Participants with existing cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease receive less preventive therapy than those with CAD or even risk factors alone. This observation is consistent across all mainland states. Given the evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating all types of vascular diseases, the present study suggests that there is scope to improve the treatment of these high-risk participants in Australia.
澳大利亚的药品福利计划支持使用有效药物来预防和控制心血管危险因素。然而,几乎没有数据描述社区中一级预防和二级预防的人均用药成本。我们旨在通过参与“持续健康的动脉粥样硬化血栓形成减少”(REACH)注册研究的参与者,了解根据心血管疾病的程度和范围,心血管药物的年度支出情况。通过273家澳大利亚普通诊所招募了2873名参与者进入REACH注册研究。在基线时进行了心血管药物审查。使用政府报销价格估算药物的平均加权成本。年度成本按疾病范围和部位进行分层。人均药品年度平均成本为1307澳元。所有州和参与者组的人均报告用药量差异显著。患有脑血管或外周动脉疾病的参与者比患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的参与者开具的心血管药物更少(平均药物数量分别为3.5种对4.5种,P<0.0001)以及(3.6种对4.5种,P<0.0001),而仅患有危险因素的参与者与患有CAD的参与者用药量相同(平均数量为4.5种)。与东部各州相比,西澳大利亚州的用药量较低。患有现有脑血管疾病和外周血管疾病的参与者比患有CAD甚至仅患有危险因素的参与者接受的预防性治疗更少。这一观察结果在所有大陆州都是一致的。鉴于治疗所有类型血管疾病的有效性和成本效益的证据,本研究表明澳大利亚有改善这些高危参与者治疗的空间。