Todryk Stephen M, Pathan Ansar A, Keating Sheila, Porter David W, Berthoud Tamara, Thompson Fiona, Klenerman Paul, Hill Adrian V S
Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Immunology. 2009 Sep;128(1):83-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03073.x.
Maintenance of T-cell responses is an essential feature in protection from many infectious diseases that must be harnessed in vaccination. The relationship between effector T-cell responses and more durable and highly proliferative T-cell memory, particularly in humans, is not well understood. In this study, effector T-cell responses were measured by overnight ex vivo interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot-forming cell assay (ELISPOT), whereas memory T cells were measured by 10-day culture followed by IFN-gamma ELISPOT (cultured ELISPOT). We observed a significant correlation between IFN-gamma responses to CD4-stimulatory, but not to CD8-stimulatory, recall antigens measured by these assays, suggesting a divergence in regulation. In vaccine trial participants who received a prime-boost vaccination regimen comprising malaria antigens delivered by poxviruses, there was a correlation between ex vivo and cultured responses on day 7, but not 3 months post-vaccination, with the ratio of cultured : ex vivo response increasing over time. To compare responses revealed by cultured ELISPOT in more detail, tetramers comprising viral recall antigens were used to ascribe effector-memory and central-memory T-cell phenotypes through CCR7 and CD62L costaining. For CD8(+) responses the effector phenotype decreased during the initial culture period and memory populations remained high within the resulting 20-fold to 50-fold increased IFN-gamma-secreting or tetramer(+) population. This was less marked for CD4(+) responses, which had higher starting memory phenotype. Depletion of these central-memory T-cell populations generally ablated responses in cultured ELISPOT and reduced ex vivo responses. This study highlights differences between CD4(+) and CD8(+) effector and memory T cells, and the more complex phenotype of CD4(+) T cells.
维持T细胞反应是预防许多传染病的一项基本特征,而这一特征在疫苗接种中必须加以利用。效应T细胞反应与更持久且增殖性更强的T细胞记忆之间的关系,尤其是在人类中,目前还不太清楚。在本研究中,效应T细胞反应通过过夜体外干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)酶联免疫斑点形成细胞测定法(ELISPOT)进行测量,而记忆T细胞则通过10天培养后再进行IFN-γ ELISPOT(培养ELISPOT)来测量。我们观察到,通过这些测定法测量的对CD4刺激而非CD8刺激的回忆抗原的IFN-γ反应之间存在显著相关性,这表明在调节方面存在差异。在接受包含痘病毒递送的疟疾抗原的初免-加强疫苗接种方案的疫苗试验参与者中,第7天的体外反应与培养反应之间存在相关性,但在接种疫苗3个月后则不存在,且培养:体外反应的比率随时间增加。为了更详细地比较培养ELISPOT所揭示的反应,使用包含病毒回忆抗原的四聚体通过CCR7和CD62L共染色来确定效应记忆和中枢记忆T细胞表型。对于CD8(+)反应,效应表型在初始培养期下降,而在最终IFN-γ分泌增加20倍至50倍或四聚体(+)的群体中,记忆群体保持较高水平。对于CD4(+)反应,这种情况不太明显,但CD4(+)反应具有更高的起始记忆表型。这些中枢记忆T细胞群体的耗竭通常会消除培养ELISPOT中的反应并降低体外反应。本研究突出了CD4(+)和CD8(+)效应和记忆T细胞之间的差异,以及CD4(+) T细胞更复杂的表型。