Khan Zahid Hussain, Mohammadi Mostafa, Rasouli Mohammad R, Farrokhnia Fahimeh, Khan Razmeh Hussain
Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):822-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af7f0d.
Accuracy of upper lip bite test (ULBT) has been compared with the Mallampati classification. In this study, we investigated whether the combination of the ULBT classification with sternomental distance (SMD), thyromental distance (TMD), and interincisor distance (IID) or a composite score can improve the ability to predict easy laryngoscopy and intubation compared with each test alone.
In a prospective study, 380 patients who were scheduled for elective surgery were selected randomly and enrolled in the study. Before inducing anesthesia, the airways were assessed, and ULBT class, SMD, TMD, and IID determined. Laryngoscopic view according to the Cormack and Lehane grading system was determined after induction of anesthesia and Grades 3 and 4 defined as "difficult intubation." By using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the best cutoff points of the tests were calculated. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of these tests and their combinations with the ULBT were calculated.
The prevalence of difficult intubation was 5% (n = 19). Class III ULBT, IID <4.5 cm, TMD <6.5 cm, and SMD <13 cm were defined as predictors of difficult intubation. There was no significant difference regarding difficult intubation based on gender (P < 0.05), whereas there were significant differences between the older tests and laryngeal view (P < 0.05, Mc-Nemar test). Specificity and accuracy of the ULBT were significantly higher than TMD, SMD, and IID individually (specificity was 91.69%, 82.27%, 70.64%, and 82.27%, respectively, and accuracy was 91.05%, 71.32%, 81.84%, and 76.58%, respectively). The combination of the ULBT with SMD provided the highest sensitivity.
We conclude that the specificity and accuracy of the ULBT is significantly higher than the other tests and is more accurate in airway assessment. However, the ULBT in conjunction with the other tests could more reliably predict easy laryngoscopy or intubation.
已将上唇咬试验(ULBT)的准确性与马兰帕蒂分级进行了比较。在本研究中,我们调查了ULBT分级与胸骨颏距离(SMD)、甲状软骨颏距离(TMD)和门齿间距离(IID)的组合或综合评分与单独的每项测试相比,是否能提高预测喉镜检查和插管容易程度的能力。
在一项前瞻性研究中,随机选择380例计划进行择期手术的患者并纳入研究。在诱导麻醉前,评估气道,确定ULBT分级、SMD、TMD和IID。在诱导麻醉后,根据科马克和莱哈尼分级系统确定喉镜视野,并将3级和4级定义为“困难插管”。通过使用受试者工作特征分析,计算各项测试的最佳截断点。最后,计算这些测试及其与ULBT组合的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。
困难插管的发生率为5%(n = 19)。ULBT III级、IID <4.5 cm、TMD <6.5 cm和SMD <13 cm被定义为困难插管的预测指标。基于性别在困难插管方面无显著差异(P < 0.05),而在年龄较大患者的测试与喉镜视野之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05,麦克尼马尔检验)。ULBT的特异性和准确性分别显著高于TMD、SMD和IID(特异性分别为91.69%、82.27%、70.64%和82.27%,准确性分别为91.05%、71.32%、81.84%和76.58%)。ULBT与SMD的组合提供了最高的敏感性。
我们得出结论,ULBT的特异性和准确性显著高于其他测试,在气道评估中更准确。然而,ULBT与其他测试相结合可以更可靠地预测喉镜检查或插管是否容易。