Hwang Hye Jeon, Kim Kyoung Won, Jeong Woo Kyoung, Kim So Yeon, Song Gi-Won, Hwang Shin, Lee Sung-Gyu
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, Pungnap 2-dong, Songpa-ku, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep;193(3):745-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2145.
The objective of our study was to compare CT and Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic outflow obstruction at the middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries and inferior right hepatic veins (RHVs) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with modified right lobe grafts.
Thirty-seven venographies were performed in 36 patients after LDLT with modified right lobe grafts, evaluating 51 MHV tributaries and 25 inferior RHVs. They were classified as obstructed or nonobstructed. On Doppler ultrasound or CT, flow patterns of the MHV tributaries and inferior RHVs or the relative parenchymal attenuation, enhancement, and opacification of these veins were evaluated for the diagnosis of hepatic outflow obstruction. McNemar tests were performed to compare the diagnostic values of Doppler ultrasound and CT.
On the basis of hepatic venography, 33 MHV tributaries were categorized as obstructed and 18 as nonobstructed, and 16 inferior RHVs were categorized as obstructed and nine as nonobstructed. For the diagnosis of MHV tributary obstruction, Doppler ultrasound was more sensitive and accurate, although less specific, than CT (97% vs 39%, respectively, p < 0.001; 86% vs 61%, p = 0.0209; 67% vs 100%, p = 0.0412). Similarly, Doppler ultrasound was more sensitive (94% vs 31%, respectively) and accurate (84% vs 56%) than CT, although less specific (67% vs 100%), for the diagnosis of inferior RHV obstruction, with a statistical significance only for sensitivity (p = 0.002, 0.092, and 0.248, respectively).
Doppler ultrasound is more sensitive and accurate than CT for the detection of obstruction at the MHV tributaries and inferior RHVs in patients after LDLT using modified right lobe grafts. Although current CT criteria produce high specificity and may reduce unnecessary invasive venographies, optimal CT criteria with acceptable sensitivity should be reestablished.
我们研究的目的是比较CT和多普勒超声在活体肝移植(LDLT)采用改良右叶移植术后肝中静脉(MHV)分支及右下肝静脉(RHVs)肝静脉流出道梗阻诊断中的应用。
对36例接受改良右叶移植的LDLT患者进行了37次静脉造影,评估了51条MHV分支和25条右下RHVs。将其分为梗阻或非梗阻。在多普勒超声或CT上,评估MHV分支和右下RHVs的血流模式或这些静脉的相对实质衰减、强化及密度变化,以诊断肝静脉流出道梗阻。采用McNemar检验比较多普勒超声和CT的诊断价值。
根据肝静脉造影,33条MHV分支被分类为梗阻,18条为非梗阻,16条右下RHVs被分类为梗阻,9条为非梗阻。对于MHV分支梗阻的诊断,多普勒超声比CT更敏感、准确,尽管特异性较低(分别为97%对39%,p<0.001;86%对61%,p = 0.0209;67%对100%,p = 0.0412)。同样,对于右下RHV梗阻的诊断,多普勒超声比CT更敏感(分别为94%对31%)和准确(84%对56%),尽管特异性较低(67%对100%),仅敏感性具有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.002、0.092和0.248)。
对于采用改良右叶移植的LDLT患者,多普勒超声在检测MHV分支和右下RHVs梗阻方面比CT更敏感、准确。尽管目前的CT标准具有较高的特异性,可能减少不必要的侵入性静脉造影,但应重新建立具有可接受敏感性的最佳CT标准。