• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 型糖尿病患儿持续皮下胰岛素输注和每日甘精胰岛素补充注射的可行性。

Feasibility of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and daily supplemental insulin glargine injection in children with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Aug;11(8):481-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0124.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2008.0124
PMID:19698060
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is an effective method of insulin substitution with increased risk of hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in rare situations. The lack of subcutaneous long-acting insulin and short half-life of serum insulin increases the risk of ketosis and DKA following CSII failure. We evaluated the metabolic effects of CSII with and without daily supplemental long-acting insulin glargine in a group of young children switched to CSII from multiple daily insulin (premeal aspart + glargine) to either CSII plus daily glargine (CSII + G) or CSII therapy.

METHODS

From retrospective clinic data, self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c)), hypoglycemic episodes, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained from 12 patients (five girls, seven boys; 7.7 +/- 1.8 years) on CSII + G and 12 age- and gender-matched patients (five girls, seven boys; 7.7 +/- 2.1 years) on CSII with similar baseline HbA(1c) and BMI were reviewed over a 1.0-year period.

RESULTS

The insulin glargine dose in the CSII + G group was 30.6 +/- 12.4% (range, 13.9-53.3%) of daily basal insulin dose. Both groups had similar total daily insulin and bolus:basal insulin at baseline and at 1.0 year. Glycemic control improved in the CSII + G (SMBG, 195.5 +/- 47.3 vs. 156.8 +/- 36.8 mg/dL, P < 0.05; HbA(1c), 8.1 +/- 0.9% vs. 7.4 +/- 0.4%, P < 0.02) and CSII (SMBG, 198.7 +/- 45.7 vs. 161.4 +/- 30.9 mg/dL, P < 0.05; HbA(1c), 8.2 +/- 0.4% vs. 7.7 +/- 0.5%, P < 0.01) groups without significant changes in hypoglycemic episodes and BMI. There were no DKA episodes despite three emergency room visits for hyperglycemia and ketosis due to catheter dislodgement only in the CSII group.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII therapy with or without daily insulin glargine improved glycemic control without changes in the rate of hypoglycemia and DKA, suggesting that this treatment regimen is feasible and may also prevent development of hyperglycemia and ketosis or even DKA.

摘要

背景

持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)是一种有效的胰岛素替代方法,但在罕见情况下会增加低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的风险。由于缺乏皮下长效胰岛素和血清胰岛素半衰期短,CSII 失败后会增加酮症和 DKA 的风险。我们评估了一组儿童从多次胰岛素注射(餐前门冬氨酸+甘精胰岛素)转换为 CSII 后,CSII 联合每日甘精胰岛素(CSII+G)或 CSII 治疗时,CSII 加用每日甘精胰岛素与单独 CSII 对代谢的影响。

方法

从回顾性临床数据中,我们从 12 名患者(5 名女孩,7 名男孩;7.7+/-1.8 岁)获得了自我监测血糖(SMBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、低血糖发作和体重指数(BMI),这些患者在接受 CSII+G 治疗 1.0 年后,其中 12 名年龄和性别匹配的患者(5 名女孩,7 名男孩;7.7+/-2.1 岁)接受了类似的 CSII 治疗,且基线 HbA1c 和 BMI 相似。

结果

CSII+G 组的甘精胰岛素剂量为每日基础胰岛素剂量的 30.6+/-12.4%(范围 13.9-53.3%)。两组的总日胰岛素和餐时胰岛素:基础胰岛素在基线和 1.0 年时均相似。CSII+G 组(SMBG,195.5+/-47.3 vs. 156.8+/-36.8mg/dL,P<0.05;HbA1c,8.1+/-0.9% vs. 7.4+/-0.4%,P<0.02)和 CSII 组(SMBG,198.7+/-45.7 vs. 161.4+/-30.9mg/dL,P<0.05;HbA1c,8.2+/-0.4% vs. 7.7+/-0.5%,P<0.01)的血糖控制均有所改善,且低血糖发作和 BMI 无显著变化。尽管在 CSII 组因导管移位而有 3 次因高血糖和酮症酸中毒急诊就诊,但无 DKA 发作。

结论

CSII 联合或不联合每日甘精胰岛素治疗可改善血糖控制,而低血糖和 DKA 的发生率无变化,提示该治疗方案可行,也可能预防高血糖和酮症酸中毒甚至 DKA 的发生。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and daily supplemental insulin glargine injection in children with type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患儿持续皮下胰岛素输注和每日甘精胰岛素补充注射的可行性。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Aug;11(8):481-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0124.
2
A randomized, prospective trial comparing the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple daily injections using insulin glargine.一项比较持续皮下胰岛素输注与使用甘精胰岛素多次每日注射疗效的随机前瞻性试验。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Jul;27(7):1554-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.7.1554.
3
Benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes previously treated with multiple daily injections with once-daily glargine and pre-meal analogues.持续皮下胰岛素输注对既往接受每日一次甘精胰岛素和餐时胰岛素类似物多次皮下注射治疗的1型糖尿病患者的益处。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009 Sep;117(8):378-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1225337. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
4
Beneficial effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and flexible multiple daily insulin regimen using insulin glargine in type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注及使用甘精胰岛素的灵活多次每日胰岛素方案对1型糖尿病的有益作用。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):e91-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.e91.
5
In Type 1 diabetic patients with good glycaemic control, blood glucose variability is lower during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion than during multiple daily injections with insulin glargine.在血糖控制良好的1型糖尿病患者中,持续皮下胰岛素输注期间的血糖变异性低于每日多次注射甘精胰岛素期间的血糖变异性。
Diabet Med. 2008 Mar;25(3):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02365.x.
6
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of insulin aspart versus multiple daily injection of insulin aspart/insulin glargine in type 1 diabetic patients previously treated with CSII.门冬胰岛素持续皮下输注(CSII)与门冬胰岛素/甘精胰岛素多次皮下注射用于既往接受CSII治疗的1型糖尿病患者的比较
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):533-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.533.
7
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion attenuated glycemic instability in preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.持续皮下胰岛素输注可减轻1型糖尿病学龄前儿童的血糖不稳定。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Aug;9(4):339-47. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.0038.
8
Long-term use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with multiple daily injections of glargine in pediatric patients.儿科患者中持续皮下胰岛素输注与甘精胰岛素多次每日注射的长期使用比较。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jan;20(1):37-40. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2007.20.1.37.
9
Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study.1型糖尿病中多次皮下注射胰岛素方案(基础胰岛素每日一次甘精胰岛素加餐时胰岛素赖脯胰岛素)与持续皮下胰岛素输注(胰岛素赖脯胰岛素)的比较:一项随机开放平行多中心研究。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1170-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1874. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
10
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与现代多次胰岛素注射方案的比较:随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
An "out of the box" approach for prevention of ketoacidosis in youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: combined use of insulin pump and long-acting insulin.一种用于预防未经良好控制的 1 型糖尿病青少年酮症酸中毒的“即用型”方法:胰岛素泵和长效胰岛素联合使用。
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Oct;61(10):1241-1249. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02264-7. Epub 2024 May 18.
2
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes.国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病儿童和青少年的运动
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1341-1372. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13452.
3
Insulin pump therapy is associated with higher rates of mild diabetic ketoacidosis compared to injection therapy: A 2-year Swedish national survey of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
与注射治疗相比,胰岛素泵治疗与轻度糖尿病酮症酸中毒的发生率较高:瑞典对 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年进行的一项为期 2 年的全国性调查。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Nov;23(7):1038-1044. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13377. Epub 2022 Jun 17.