Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Anal Biochem. 2010 Jan 1;396(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.08.027. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
Methylation and acetylation of lysines are crucial posttranslational modifications that regulate gene transcription and have been shown to be misregulated in many forms of cancers. Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence are commonly used to characterize histone acetylation and methylation. However, these approaches are limited by the availability, site specificity, and cross-reactivity of antibodies. Mass spectrometry is emerging as an additional powerful tool for histone characterization. The isobaric nature of trimethylation and acetylation (42.0470 and 42.0106 Da, respectively) confounds histone characterization by means other than high-resolution/high-mass accuracy mass spectrometry. In this study, we adapted methodology that exploits difference in the relative retention time of acetylated and methylated peptides to unequivocally distinguish between these two modifications even with low-mass accuracy mass spectrometers. The approach was tested on tryptic digest of Saccharomyces cerevisiae histones. We found that acetylation resulted in increased retention in reversed-phase chromatography, whereas methylation, including trimethylation, showed little change in retention. For example, the acetylated forms of peptide (27)KSAPSTGGVKKPHR(40) eluted at 15.63 min, whereas the methylated forms eluted at 13.89 min. In addition, the effect of acetylation was cumulative as observed in the case of peptide (9)KSTGGKAPR(17), whose unmodified, monoacetylated, and diacetylated isoforms eluted at 7.43, 10.47, and 16.49 min, respectively. The modification patterns of the peptides in question were subsequently verified by high-mass accuracy tandem mass spectrometry.
赖氨酸的甲基化和乙酰化是至关重要的翻译后修饰,它们调节基因转录,并且在许多形式的癌症中被证明是失调的。Western blot、免疫沉淀和免疫荧光通常用于表征组蛋白乙酰化和甲基化。然而,这些方法受到抗体的可用性、特异性和交叉反应性的限制。质谱分析正成为组蛋白表征的另一种强大工具。三甲基化和乙酰化的等质异位性(分别为 42.0470 和 42.0106 Da)使得除了高分辨率/高质量精度质谱之外的其他方法难以对组蛋白进行特征描述。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种方法,该方法利用乙酰化和甲基化肽的相对保留时间的差异,即使使用低质量精度的质谱仪,也可以明确地区分这两种修饰。该方法在酿酒酵母组蛋白的胰蛋白酶消化物上进行了测试。我们发现乙酰化导致反相色谱中的保留时间增加,而甲基化,包括三甲基化,保留时间几乎没有变化。例如,肽(27)KSAPSTGGVKKPHR(40)的乙酰化形式在 15.63 分钟洗脱,而甲基化形式在 13.89 分钟洗脱。此外,如肽(9)KSTGGKAPR(17)的情况所示,乙酰化的影响是累积的,其未修饰、单乙酰化和二乙酰化的异构体分别在 7.43、10.47 和 16.49 分钟洗脱。问题肽的修饰模式随后通过高质量精度串联质谱得到验证。