• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压迫性薄膜与皮下缝合:比较儿童单次双侧肢体手术后的皮肤闭合时间

Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children.

作者信息

Rebello Gleeson, Parikh Ravi, Grottkau Brian

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):626-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba1b.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba1b
PMID:19700995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing skin closure time between coaptive film and subcuticular monocryl sutures in children undergoing identical single session, bilateral limb multiple soft tissue releases.

METHODS

Eight children less than 18 years of age (mean 14.5) with cerebral palsy underwent identical, single session bilateral multiple soft tissue releases in the lower limb from August 2005 to March 2007. There were 50 incisions in all in which 25 incisions were closed with 4-0 intracuticular monocryl sutures and 25 were closed with coaptive film (Steri Strip S; 3M company). Time taken for closure using either technique was recorded. A blinded plastic surgeon used a visual analog scale to assess the cosmetic results at the end of a 3 month follow-up.

RESULTS

The average length of incisions closed with coaptive film was almost identical to the corresponding incision on the contralateral limb that was closed with subcuticular monocryl suture (4.45 and 4.81 cm, P=0.66). The average time for skin closure using monocryl sutures was 167.04 seconds compared with the average time of 79.36 seconds when using coaptive film (P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic results or the number of wound complications using either technique.

CONCLUSION

Coaptive film is an attractive and cost-effective option for skin closure after pediatric surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The time saved, comparable cosmetic results and lack of complications makes coaptive film an attractive option for skin closure in the pediatric age group.

摘要

背景

本研究是一项随机对照试验,比较在接受相同单次双侧肢体多处软组织松解术的儿童中,粘贴薄膜与皮下单丝缝线的皮肤闭合时间。

方法

2005年8月至2007年3月,8名年龄小于18岁(平均14.5岁)的脑瘫患儿接受了相同的单次双侧下肢多处软组织松解术。共有50处切口,其中25处切口用4-0皮内单丝缝线缝合,25处用粘贴薄膜(3M公司的思乐扣S)闭合。记录使用每种技术的闭合时间。一名不知情的整形外科医生在3个月随访结束时使用视觉模拟量表评估美容效果。

结果

用粘贴薄膜闭合的切口平均长度与对侧肢体用皮下单丝缝线闭合的相应切口几乎相同(4.45和4.81厘米,P=0.66)。使用单丝缝线闭合皮肤的平均时间为167.04秒,而使用粘贴薄膜时平均时间为79.36秒(P<0.0001)。两种技术在美容效果或伤口并发症数量方面没有显著差异。

结论

粘贴薄膜是小儿外科手术后皮肤闭合的一种有吸引力且经济有效的选择。

临床意义

节省的时间、相当的美容效果以及无并发症使得粘贴薄膜成为小儿年龄组皮肤闭合的一个有吸引力的选择。

相似文献

1
Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children.压迫性薄膜与皮下缝合:比较儿童单次双侧肢体手术后的皮肤闭合时间
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):626-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba1b.
2
A prospective, randomized comparison of skin adhesive and subcuticular suture for closure of pediatric hernia incisions: cost and cosmetic considerations.皮肤粘合剂与皮下缝合用于小儿疝气切口闭合的前瞻性随机对照研究:成本与美容考量
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jul;44(7):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.051.
3
Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time after posterior spinal instrumented fusion in pediatric patients with spinal deformity.束缚膜与皮内缝合:比较脊柱畸形患儿后路脊柱内固定融合术后皮肤闭合时间。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2027-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c8ad82.
4
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.比较氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂与传统皮下皮肤缝线用于颌面切口——一项考虑闭合时间、伤口发病率和美容效果的前瞻性随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029.
5
Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.脑外科手术中皮肤胶水与传统伤口闭合方法的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;16(4):535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.004. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
6
A prospective comparison of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for the closure of head and neck incisions.氰基丙烯酸正辛酯组织粘合剂与缝线用于头颈部切口闭合的前瞻性比较
J Otolaryngol. 1997 Feb;26(1):26-30.
7
Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?钛夹与缝合技术:有区别吗?
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Nov;16(11):1403-7.
8
Adhesive strips versus subcuticular suture for mediansternotomy wound closure.用于正中开胸伤口闭合的粘贴条与皮下缝合的比较。
J Card Surg. 2011 Jul;26(4):344-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01257.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
9
Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.在猪实验中运用三维测量技术比较治疗皮肤裂伤的各种方法和材料
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 May;58(5):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000245135.58229.e7.
10
Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.Pfannenstiel皮肤切口的闭合。吻合钉与皮下缝合。
J Reprod Med. 1997 Oct;42(10):627-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中用于皮肤缝合的皮下缝合线
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2.
2
Comparative study between coaptive film versus suture for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation.长骨骨折固定术后伤口闭合中束缚膜与缝线的比较研究。
Malays Orthop J. 2013 Mar;7(1):52-5. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1303.017.
3
Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口缝合的可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的系统评价。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec 27;6(12):241-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241.