Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2027-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c8ad82.
A prospective, randomized trial comparing skin closure time between coaptive film and subcuticular Monocryl sutures in children undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion.
To prospectively compare skin closure time, complication rate and cosmetic result between coaptive film and subcuticular Monocryl wound closures in pediatric spine surgery.
Posterior instrumented spinal fusions for spinal deformity in children are time-consuming ventures that are demanding on both the patient and physician. Minimizing the time for skin closure at the end of prolonged surgery diminishes the physical burden on the surgeon, the operating room personnel, and reduces operating room costs.
Twenty-five children (mean age, 14.1 year) underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion. Twenty-five incisions in 25 patients (12 closed with 3-0 subcuticular Monocryl sutures, 13 closed with coaptive film [Steri Strip S; 3 M company]) were evaluated. The method of skin closure was randomized before beginning the procedure and the surgeon informed just before skin closure. Closure time was recorded. A blinded plastic surgeon using a visual analogue scale assessed the cosmetic results at a minimum 3-month follow-up.
Incisions closed with coaptive film required less time to complete than incisions closed with subcuticular suture. The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 290.62 seconds compared to the mean time of 674.75 seconds using Monocryl sutures (P < 0.000001). The average length of incisions closed with coaptive film was similar to the corresponding incisions that were closed with subcuticular Monocryl sutures (30.8 and 34.0 cm, respectively, P = 0.22). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic results or the number of wound complications using either technique.
Coaptive film is a time-saving option for skin closure following pediatric spine surgery with comparable cosmetic results and no difference in complication rates.
一项前瞻性、随机试验,比较儿童后路器械融合术后使用 coaptive 膜和皮下单丝可吸收缝线缝合的皮肤闭合时间。
前瞻性比较 coaptive 膜和皮下单丝可吸收缝线闭合小儿脊柱手术后皮肤闭合时间、并发症发生率和美容效果。
儿童脊柱畸形后路器械融合术是一项耗时的手术,对患者和医生都有很高的要求。在长时间手术结束时缩短皮肤闭合时间,可以减轻外科医生、手术室人员的身体负担,降低手术室成本。
25 例儿童(平均年龄 14.1 岁)接受后路器械融合术。25 个切口(12 个采用 3-0 皮下单丝可吸收缝线缝合,13 个采用 coaptive 膜[Steri Strip S;3M 公司]缝合)的 25 例患者参与了这项研究。在开始手术前,随机选择皮肤缝合方法,在皮肤缝合前告知外科医生。记录闭合时间。一位经过培训的整形外科医生使用视觉模拟评分法在至少 3 个月的随访时评估美容效果。
使用 coaptive 膜闭合的切口所需时间明显少于使用皮下单丝可吸收缝线缝合的切口。使用 coaptive 膜闭合皮肤的平均时间为 290.62 秒,而使用单丝可吸收缝线的平均时间为 674.75 秒(P < 0.000001)。使用 coaptive 膜闭合的切口长度与使用皮下单丝可吸收缝线缝合的切口长度相似(分别为 30.8 和 34.0 cm,P = 0.22)。两种技术的美容效果或伤口并发症发生率无显著差异。
coaptive 膜是小儿脊柱手术后皮肤闭合的一种节省时间的选择,具有相似的美容效果,并发症发生率无差异。