Suppr超能文献

钆贝葡胺和钆塞酸二钠对肝脏血管的增强作用:健康志愿者的比较研究

Liver vessel enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: a comparison in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Brismar T B, Dahlstrom N, Edsborg N, Persson A, Smedby O, Albiin N

机构信息

Department for Clinical Science, Division of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2009 Sep;50(7):709-15. doi: 10.1080/02841850903055603.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A thorough understanding of magnetic resonance (MR) contrast media dynamics makes it possible to choose the optimal contrast media for each investigation. Differences in visualizing hepatobiliary function between Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA have previously been demonstrated, but less has been published regarding differences in liver vessel visualization.

PURPOSE

To compare the liver vessel and liver parenchymal enhancement dynamics of Gd-BOPTA (MultiHance) and Gd-EOB-DTPA (Primovist).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The signal intensity of the liver parenchyma, the common hepatic artery, the middle hepatic vein, and a segmental branch of the right portal vein was obtained in 10 healthy volunteers before contrast media administration, during arterial and portal venous phases, and 10, 20, 30, 40, and 130 min after intravenous contrast medium injection, but, due to scanner limitations, not during the hepatic venous phase. The doses of contrast media were 0.1 mmol/kg for Gd-BOPTA and 0.025 mmol/kg for Gd-EOB-DTPA.

RESULTS

Maximum enhancement of liver parenchyma was observed from the portal venous phase until 130 min after Gd-BOPTA administration and from 10 min to 40 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA. There was no difference in maximum enhancement of liver parenchyma between the two contrast media. When using Gd-BOPTA, the vascular contrast enhancement was still apparent 40 min after injection, but had vanished 10 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection. The maximum difference in signal intensity between the vessels and the liver parenchyma was significantly greater with Gd-BOPTA than with Gd-EOB-DTPA (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

At the dosage used in this study, Gd-BOPTA yields higher maximum enhancement of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and middle hepatic vein during the arterial and the portal venous phase and during the delayed phases than Gd-EOB-DTPA does, whereas there is no difference in liver parenchymal enhancement between the two contrast agents.

摘要

背景

深入了解磁共振(MR)造影剂动力学有助于为每项检查选择最佳造影剂。此前已证实钆贝葡胺(Gd - BOPTA)和钆塞酸二钠(Gd - EOB - DTPA)在显示肝胆功能方面存在差异,但关于肝脏血管显影差异的报道较少。

目的

比较钆贝葡胺(MultiHance)和钆塞酸二钠(Primovist)对肝脏血管和肝实质的增强动力学。

材料与方法

在10名健康志愿者中,于注射造影剂前、动脉期和门静脉期以及静脉注射造影剂后10、20、30、40和130分钟获取肝实质、肝总动脉、肝中静脉和右门静脉分支的信号强度,但由于扫描仪限制,未在肝静脉期进行测量。钆贝葡胺的造影剂剂量为0.1 mmol/kg,钆塞酸二钠为0.025 mmol/kg。

结果

钆贝葡胺给药后,门静脉期至130分钟以及钆塞酸二钠给药后10分钟至40分钟观察到肝实质的最大增强。两种造影剂在肝实质最大增强方面无差异。使用钆贝葡胺时,注射后40分钟血管造影增强仍明显,但钆塞酸二钠注射后10分钟增强消失。钆贝葡胺使血管与肝实质之间的信号强度最大差异显著大于钆塞酸二钠(P<0.0001)。

结论

在本研究使用的剂量下,与钆塞酸二钠相比,钆贝葡胺在动脉期、门静脉期和延迟期对肝动脉、门静脉和肝中静脉产生更高的最大增强,而两种造影剂在肝实质增强方面无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验