Arbaizar Beatriz, Dierssen-Sotos Trinidad, Gómez-Acebo Inés, Llorca Javier
Unit of Mental Health, Hospital de Laredo, Laredo, Spain.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
We performed meta-analyses to obtain pooled estimates from controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of aripiprazole in major depression disorder and manic phase of bipolar disorder.
A search was performed in Medline/PubMed using "aripiprazole" AND "depressive disorder" and "aripiprazole" AND "bipolar disorder" as keywords, and "randomized controlled trial" as limit. The last search was performed by April 30, 2009. References in the selected articles were revised to identify other studies. We selected four placebo-controlled clinical trials on aripiprazole's effect on major depression, and three on aripiprazole's effect on bipolar disorder. Studies performed in patients with comorbidity or devoted to measuring the effect of aripiprazole for maintenance therapy were excluded. We extracted, in duplicate, data on number of patients, withdrawals, changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), response and remission rates, and side effects.
Aripripazole is effective in increasing response rates in depressive patients (response rate in the aripiprazole group minus response rate in the placebo group: 7.7%, 95% CI: 1.5-14.2) and manic patients (difference in response rates: 15.7%, 95% CI: 9.7-21.8). It also improves by 3 points the scores in YMRS. Evidence of improving remission rates is unavailable. Some side effects were more frequent in patients taking aripiprazole; this was the case of akathisia, especially in depressive trials (rate difference: 20.3%, 95% CI: 16.9-23.7), and nausea in manic patients (rate difference: 10.5%, 95% CI: 7.4-13.5). Insomnia and restlessness were also more frequent in depressive patients taking aripiprazole.
We found evidence suggesting that aripiprazole is effective in both depressive and manic patients, but has relevant side effects. Further research is needed to identify its benefits for comorbid patients and its long-term effect.
我们进行了荟萃分析,以从关于阿立哌唑治疗重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍躁狂期疗效的对照临床试验中获得合并估计值。
在Medline/PubMed中进行检索,使用“阿立哌唑”与“抑郁症”以及“阿立哌唑”与“双相情感障碍”作为关键词,并将“随机对照试验”设为限制条件。最后一次检索于2009年4月30日进行。对所选文章中的参考文献进行修订以识别其他研究。我们选择了四项关于阿立哌唑对重度抑郁症影响的安慰剂对照临床试验,以及三项关于阿立哌唑对双相情感障碍影响的试验。排除在合并症患者中进行的研究或致力于测量阿立哌唑维持治疗效果的研究。我们重复提取了患者数量、退出人数、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表和杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)的变化、缓解率和不良反应的数据。
阿立哌唑在提高抑郁症患者的缓解率方面有效(阿立哌唑组的缓解率减去安慰剂组的缓解率:7.7%,95%置信区间:1.5 - 14.2),在躁狂症患者中也有效(缓解率差异:15.7%,95%置信区间:9.7 - 21.8)。它还使YMRS评分提高了3分。目前尚无改善缓解率的证据。服用阿立哌唑的患者中某些不良反应更为常见;静坐不能尤其如此,在抑郁症试验中更为明显(发生率差异:20.3%,95%置信区间:16.9 - 23.7),在躁狂症患者中恶心更为常见(发生率差异:10.5%,95%置信区间:7.4 - 13.5)。服用阿立哌唑的抑郁症患者中失眠和烦躁也更为常见。
我们发现有证据表明阿立哌唑对抑郁症和躁狂症患者均有效,但存在相关不良反应。需要进一步研究以确定其对合并症患者的益处及其长期效果。