Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药换药与增效对难治性重度抑郁症患者缓解率的影响:VAST-D随机临床试验

Effect of Antidepressant Switching vs Augmentation on Remission Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Antidepressant Treatment: The VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Mohamed Somaia, Johnson Gary R, Chen Peijun, Hicks Paul B, Davis Lori L, Yoon Jean, Gleason Theresa C, Vertrees Julia E, Weingart Kimberly, Tal Ilanit, Scrymgeour Alexandra, Lawrence David D, Planeta Beata, Thase Michael E, Huang Grant D, Zisook Sidney, Rao Sanjai D, Pilkinton Patricia D, Wilcox James A, Iranmanesh Ali, Sapra Mamta, Jurjus George, Michalets James P, Aslam Muhammed, Beresford Thomas, Anderson Keith D, Fernando Ronald, Ramaswamy Sriram, Kasckow John, Westermeyer Joseph, Yoon Gihyun, D'Souza D Cyril, Larson Gunnar, Anderson William G, Klatt Mary, Fareed Ayman, Thompson Shabnam I, Carrera Carlos J, Williams Solomon S, Juergens Timothy M, Albers Lawrence J, Nasdahl Clifford S, Villarreal Gerardo, Winston Julia L, Nogues Cristobal A, Connolly K Ryan, Tapp Andre, Jones Kari A, Khatkhate Gauri, Marri Sheetal, Suppes Trisha, LaMotte Joseph, Hurley Robin, Mayeda Aimee R, Niculescu Alexander B, Fischer Bernard A, Loreck David J, Rosenlicht Nicholas, Lieske Steven, Finkel Mitchell S, Little John T

机构信息

Veterans Affairs (VA) New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven2Yale University School of Medicine, West Haven, Connecticut.

Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):132-145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8036.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Less than one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) achieve remission with their first antidepressant.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of 3 common alternate treatments for MDD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From December 2012 to May 2015, 1522 patients at 35 US Veterans Health Administration medical centers who were diagnosed with nonpsychotic MDD, unresponsive to at least 1 antidepressant course meeting minimal standards for treatment dose and duration, participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 treatments and evaluated for up to 36 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

Switch to a different antidepressant, bupropion (switch group, n = 511); augment current treatment with bupropion (augment-bupropion group, n = 506); or augment with an atypical antipsychotic, aripiprazole (augment-aripiprazole group, n = 505) for 12 weeks (acute treatment phase) and up to 36 weeks for longer-term follow-up (continuation phase).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was remission during the acute treatment phase (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated [QIDS-C16] score ≤5 at 2 consecutive visits). Secondary outcomes included response (≥50% reduction in QIDS-C16 score or improvement on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale), relapse, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Among 1522 randomized patients (mean age, 54.4 years; men, 1296 [85.2%]), 1137 (74.7%) completed the acute treatment phase. Remission rates at 12 weeks were 22.3% (n = 114) for the switch group, 26.9% (n = 136)for the augment-bupropion group, and 28.9% (n = 146) for the augment-aripiprazole group. The augment-aripiprazole group exceeded the switch group in remission (relative risk [RR], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.05-1.60]; P = .02), but other remission comparisons were not significant. Response was greater for the augment-aripiprazole group (74.3%) than for either the switch group (62.4%; RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.29]) or the augment-bupropion group (65.6%; RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]). No significant treatment differences were observed for relapse. Anxiety was more frequent in the 2 bupropion groups (24.3% in the switch group [n = 124] vs 16.6% in the augment-aripiprazole group [n = 84]; and 22.5% in augment-bupropion group [n = 114]). Adverse effects more frequent in the augment-aripiprazole group included somnolence, akathisia, and weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among a predominantly male population with major depressive disorder unresponsive to antidepressant treatment, augmentation with aripiprazole resulted in a statistically significant but only modestly increased likelihood of remission during 12 weeks of treatment compared with switching to bupropion monotherapy. Given the small effect size and adverse effects associated with aripiprazole, further analysis including cost-effectiveness is needed to understand the net utility of this approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01421342.

摘要

重要性

重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中,不到三分之一的人使用第一种抗抑郁药就能实现症状缓解。

目的

确定3种常见的MDD替代治疗方法的相对有效性和安全性。

设计、设置和参与者:2012年12月至2015年5月,美国35家退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心的1522名被诊断为非精神病性MDD且对至少1个符合治疗剂量和疗程最低标准的抗抑郁药疗程无反应的患者参与了该研究。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)至3种治疗方法中的1种,并接受长达36周的评估。

干预措施

换用另一种抗抑郁药安非他酮(换药组,n = 511);用安非他酮增强当前治疗(安非他酮增强组,n = 506);或用非典型抗精神病药阿立哌唑增强治疗(阿立哌唑增强组,n = 505),为期12周(急性治疗阶段),长达36周用于长期随访(延续阶段)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是急性治疗阶段的症状缓解(连续2次就诊时16项抑郁症状快速量表-临床医生评定版[QIDS-C16]评分≤5)。次要结局包括反应(QIDS-C16评分降低≥50%或临床总体印象改善量表上有改善)、复发和不良反应。

结果

在1522名随机分组的患者中(平均年龄54.4岁;男性1296名[85.2%]),1137名(74.7%)完成了急性治疗阶段。换药组12周时的缓解率为22.3%(n = 114),安非他酮增强组为26.9%(n = 136),阿立哌唑增强组为28.9%(n = 146)。阿立哌唑增强组在缓解方面超过了换药组(相对风险[RR],1.30[95%CI,1.05 - 1.60];P = 0.02),但其他缓解情况比较无显著性差异。阿立哌唑增强组的反应(74.3%)大于换药组(62.4%;RR,1.19[95%CI,1.09 - 1.29])或安非他酮增强组((65.6%;RR,1.13[95%CI,1.04 - 1.23])。在复发方面未观察到显著的治疗差异。2个安非他酮组的焦虑更常见(换药组为24.3%[n = 124],阿立哌唑增强组为16.6%[n = 84];安非他酮增强组为22.5%[n = 114])。阿立哌唑增强组更常见的不良反应包括嗜睡、静坐不能和体重增加。

结论和相关性

在主要为男性的、对抗抑郁药治疗无反应的重度抑郁症患者中,与换用安非他酮单药治疗相比,用阿立哌唑增强治疗在12周治疗期间导致缓解的可能性有统计学意义但仅略有增加。鉴于阿立哌唑的效应量小且有不良反应关联,需要进行包括成本效益分析在内的进一步分析,以了解该方法的净效用。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01421342。

相似文献

4
General Predictors and Moderators of Depression Remission: A VAST-D Report.一般抑郁缓解的预测因子和调节因素:VAST-D 报告。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;176(5):348-357. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18091079. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验