Ramchandren Radhakrishnan, Schiffer Charles A
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Biologics. 2009;3:205-14. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
The development of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has proven to be an example of medical success in the era of targeted therapy. However, imatinib resistance or intolerance occurs in a substantial number of patients. Additionally, patients who have progressed beyond the chronic phase of CML do relatively poorly with imatinib therapy. Mechanisms of imatinib resistance include BCR-ABL point mutations resulting in decreased imatinib binding, as well as mutation-independent causes of resistance such as SRC family kinase dysregulation, BCR-ABL gene amplification, drug influx/efflux mechanisms and other poorly understood processes. The options for therapy in these patients include stem cell transplantation, imatinib dose escalation as well as the use of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Dasatinib is a second-generation multi-kinase inhibitor with several theoretical and mechanistic advantages over imatinib. Moreover, several studies have evaluated dasatinib in patients who have progressed on imatinib therapy with encouraging results. Other novel agents such as mTOR inhibitors, bosutinib and INNO 406 have also shown promise in this setting. Although treatment options have increased, the choice of second-line therapy in patients with CML is influenced by concerns surrounding the duration of response as well as toxicity. Consequently, there is no agreed upon optimal second-line agent. This paper reviews the current data and attempts to address these issues.
伊马替尼用于治疗慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)已被证明是靶向治疗时代医学成功的一个范例。然而,相当多的患者会出现伊马替尼耐药或不耐受情况。此外,CML已进展至慢性期后的患者接受伊马替尼治疗的效果相对较差。伊马替尼耐药机制包括导致伊马替尼结合减少的BCR-ABL点突变,以及与突变无关的耐药原因,如SRC家族激酶失调、BCR-ABL基因扩增、药物流入/流出机制以及其他尚不清楚的过程。这些患者的治疗选择包括干细胞移植、伊马替尼剂量递增以及使用第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。达沙替尼是一种第二代多激酶抑制剂,与伊马替尼相比具有若干理论和机制上的优势。此外,多项研究评估了达沙替尼用于接受伊马替尼治疗后病情进展的患者,结果令人鼓舞。其他新型药物,如mTOR抑制剂、博舒替尼和INNO 406在这种情况下也显示出前景。尽管治疗选择有所增加,但CML患者二线治疗的选择受到对缓解持续时间以及毒性的担忧影响。因此,尚无达成共识的最佳二线药物。本文回顾了当前数据并试图解决这些问题。