Suppr超能文献

根管治疗牙齿会引起逆行性种植体周围炎。

Endodontic treatment of teeth induces retrograde peri-implantitis.

机构信息

Department of Implant Dentistry, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01752.x. Epub 2009 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Some cases of retrograde peri-implantitis arise from adjacent natural teeth that have peri-radicular infection. The present study was designed to investigate the incidence of retrograde peri-implantitis from adjacent teeth with endodontic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients of ages ranging from of 24-61 years were recruited for this study. A total of 128 ITI SLA implants with adjacent teeth that had received endodontic treatment at least 1 week before were placed in 128 patients. The date of endodontic therapy and the pulp status of the adjacent tooth before endodontic therapy were recorded. The distance between the implant and the adjacent tooth was determined using a radiograph. The stability of all implants was tested by OSSTELL and recorded at implant placement, after 4 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The incidence of retrograde peri-implantitis was 7.8%. The duration from endodontic-treated adjacent teeth to implant placement was 12.15+/-10.1 weeks, and the distance between the implant and the adjacent teeth was 2.99+/-1.4 mm. Distance and time were found to be related to retrograde peri-implantitis (P<0.05). The stability of implants with retrograde peri-implantitis was less than that of the normal implants, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of retrograde peri-implantitis may reduce by increasing the distance between the implant and adjacent tooth, and/or the duration from endodontically treated adjacent tooth-to-implant placement. Although preliminary, these data might orient the practitioner to avoid retrograde peri-implantitis.

摘要

目的

有些逆行性种植体周围炎是由邻牙有根尖周感染引起的。本研究旨在探讨有牙髓治疗的邻牙发生逆行性种植体周围炎的发生率。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入 128 名年龄在 24-61 岁之间的患者。在 128 名患者中,共植入了 128 个 ITI SLA 种植体,这些种植体的邻牙在植入前至少 1 周接受了牙髓治疗。记录了牙髓治疗的日期和牙髓治疗前邻牙的牙髓状态。使用 X 线片确定种植体与邻牙之间的距离。在种植体植入时、植入后 4 周和 12 周时,使用 OSSTELL 测试所有种植体的稳定性并记录。

结果

逆行性种植体周围炎的发生率为 7.8%。从牙髓治疗的邻牙到种植体植入的时间为 12.15+/-10.1 周,种植体与邻牙之间的距离为 2.99+/-1.4mm。距离和时间与逆行性种植体周围炎有关(P<0.05)。发生逆行性种植体周围炎的种植体稳定性低于正常种植体,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

通过增加种植体与邻牙之间的距离和/或从牙髓治疗的邻牙到种植体植入的时间,逆行性种植体周围炎的发生率可能会降低。尽管这些数据初步,但可能会指导临床医生避免逆行性种植体周围炎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验