Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Waste Manag Res. 2010 Feb;28(2):130-40. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09104127. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
The environmental performance of two low-organic waste landfill scenarios ('low-organic-energy' and 'low-organic-flare') was developed and compared with two household waste landfill scenarios ('household-energy' and 'household-flare') by means of LCA-modelling. The LCA-modelling was made for 1 tonne of wet waste landfilled and the environmental aspects were evaluated for a 100-year period after disposal. The data utilized in the LCA-calculations to model the first 10-20 years of landfilling of the two low-organic waste scenarios make extensive use of site-specific data from the Nauerna Landfill (The Netherlands), but average data from other comparable, existing landfills were used too. As data from full-scale landfills do not cover more than 30-40 years of landfilling, data from laboratory simulations and accelerated tests of limited scale were also utilized. The life-cycle impact assessments show that the low-organic waste scenarios achieved better environmental performance than the household waste scenarios with regard to both ordinary and toxicity-related environmental impact categories. This indicates that the reduction of organic matter accepted at landfills (as prescribed by the European Union Landfill Directive: Council Directive 1999/31/EC, EU, Brussels, 1999) can be a successful approach to decrease the environmental loads in several impact categories in comparison with landfilling of waste with significant organic content. However, when utilization of landfill gas is accounted for in the life-cycle impact assessment calculation, the small gas generation in low-organic waste landfills reduced the actual potential for energy generation and therefore the environmental savings obtained were reduced proportionally. Groundwater pollution from input of leachate was also evaluated and the WHO (Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality; WHO, Geneva, 2006) guideline for drinking water quality was assumed as reference. The results show that low-organic waste landfills pose a smaller risk of groundwater contamination, but the impact potentials estimated still remain a lot higher than estimated in other categories.
通过生命周期评估建模,开发了两种低有机废物填埋情景(“低有机-能源”和“低有机-火炬”)的环境性能,并将其与两种家庭废物填埋情景(“家庭-能源”和“家庭-火炬”)进行了比较。生命周期评估模型是针对 1 吨湿废物填埋进行的,评估了处置后 100 年内的环境方面。在生命周期评估计算中,用于模拟两种低有机废物填埋情景前 10-20 年的填埋数据广泛利用了 Nauerna 垃圾填埋场(荷兰)的特定地点数据,但也使用了其他可比现有垃圾填埋场的平均数据。由于来自全规模垃圾填埋场的数据不超过 30-40 年的填埋,因此还利用了来自实验室模拟和有限规模加速测试的数据。生命周期影响评估表明,与家庭废物填埋情景相比,低有机废物填埋情景在普通和毒性相关的环境影响类别方面均实现了更好的环境性能。这表明,按照欧盟填埋指令(理事会指令 1999/31/EC,欧盟,布鲁塞尔,1999 年)接受的填埋场有机物减少量可以成功降低几个影响类别中的环境负荷,与具有大量有机物含量的废物填埋相比。然而,当将填埋气利用纳入生命周期影响评估计算中时,低有机废物填埋场中产生的少量气体减少了实际的发电潜力,因此获得的环境节省相应减少。还评估了渗滤液输入对地下水污染的影响,并假设世界卫生组织(饮用水质量指南;世卫组织,日内瓦,2006 年)饮用水质量指南作为参考。结果表明,低有机废物填埋场对地下水污染的风险较小,但估计的影响潜力仍然比其他类别估计的高得多。