Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P,O, Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Equity Health. 2009 Aug 27;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-32.
Substantial research has documented variations in the magnitude of relative socioeconomic differences in health across European countries, and within countries, across different age groups. The aim of this paper is to examine to what extent these variations are determined by differences in the overall rate or prevalence of a health outcome across countries and age-groups in the total population.
Three surveys (European Social Survey, and two different population census-mortality registry linked longitudinal data) were used. We plotted rates of mortality and prevalence of poor self-rated health against ratios of mortality and morbidity prevalence associated with educational level. We calculated Pearson coefficients to examine the magnitude of correlations.
We found a significant negative correlation between total mortality rates and associated rate ratios of mortality by education in the SEDHA study (r = -0.40, p = 0.04), but not in the HUNT study (r = -0.37, p = 0.06). There was a weaker but significant negative correlation between the prevalence of poor health and associated prevalence ratios by education in the European social survey (r = -0.22, p = 0.00). Correlations increased as underlying prevalence and rates increased, while they were weaker or null at low prevalence or rates.
We found some evidence that the magnitude of relative inequalities in mortality and morbidity is negatively correlated with underlying morbidity prevalence and mortality rates. Although correlations are moderate, underlying morbidity prevalence and mortality rates should be taken into account in the interpretation of variations in relative health inequalities among populations.
大量研究记录了欧洲国家之间以及国家内部不同年龄组之间健康的相对社会经济差异程度的变化。本文的目的是研究这些差异在多大程度上取决于整个人群中不同国家和年龄组的健康结果的总体发生率或流行率的差异。
使用了三项调查(欧洲社会调查以及两项不同的人口普查-死亡率登记处纵向数据链接)。我们绘制了死亡率和自评健康不良的流行率与与教育程度相关的死亡率和发病率流行率比值的关系图。我们计算了 Pearson 系数来检验相关性的大小。
我们发现 SEDHA 研究中总死亡率与教育相关的死亡率比值之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.40,p = 0.04),但在 HUNT 研究中没有(r = -0.37,p = 0.06)。欧洲社会调查中,健康不良的流行率与教育相关的流行率比值之间存在较弱但显著的负相关(r = -0.22,p = 0.00)。相关性随着基础流行率和比率的增加而增加,而在低流行率或低比率时,相关性较弱或为零。
我们发现一些证据表明,死亡率和发病率的相对不平等程度与基础发病率流行率和死亡率呈负相关。虽然相关性是中等的,但在解释人群之间相对健康不平等的变化时,应考虑到基础发病率流行率和死亡率。