Neuroradiology Department, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Neurosurg. 2010 Mar;112(3):551-6. doi: 10.3171/2008.8.17657.
Endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms poses a significant technical challenge for endovascular therapists. The authors review their experience with a series of patients who had intracranial aneurysms smaller than 3 mm in diameter.
Between 1995 and 2006, 97 very small aneurysms (defined for purposes of this study as < 3 mm in diameter) were diagnosed in 94 patients who were subsequently referred for endovascular treatment. All patients presented after subarachnoid hemorrhage, which was attributed to the very small aneurysms in 85 patients. The authors reviewed the endovascular treatment, the clinical and angiographic results of the embolization, and the complications.
Five (5.2%) of the 97 endovascular procedures failed, and these patients underwent craniotomy and clip ligation. Of the 92 aneurysms successfully treated by coil embolization, 64 (69.6%) were completely occluded and 28 (30.4%) showed minor residual filling or neck remnants on the immediate postembolization angiogram. Complications occurred in 7 (7.2%) of 97 procedures during the treatment (3 thromboembolic events [3.1%] and 4 intraprocedural ruptures [4.1%]). Seventy-six patients were followed up angiographically; 4 (5.3%) of these 76 showed angiographic evidence of recanalization that required retreatment. The clinical outcomes for the 76 patients were also graded using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. In 61 (80.3%) cases the outcomes were graded 4 or 5, whereas in 15 (19.7%) they were graded 3. Seven patients (7.4%) died (GOS Grade 1), 2 due to procedure-related complications (intraoperative rupture) and 5 due to complications related to the presenting subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Endosaccular coil embolization of very small aneurysms is associated with relatively high rates of intraprocedural rupture, especially intraoperative rupture. With the advent of more sophisticated endovascular materials (microcatheters and microguidewires, soft and ultrasoft coils, and stents) endovascular procedures have become feasible and can lead to a good angiographic outcome.
血管内治疗非常小的动脉瘤对血管内治疗师来说是一个重大的技术挑战。作者回顾了他们在一组颅内直径小于 3 毫米的动脉瘤患者中的经验。
在 1995 年至 2006 年期间,94 名患者被诊断出 97 个非常小的动脉瘤(本研究中将<3 毫米的动脉瘤定义为非常小的动脉瘤),随后这些患者被转来接受血管内治疗。所有患者均因蛛网膜下腔出血而出现症状,其中 85 名患者的蛛网膜下腔出血归因于这些非常小的动脉瘤。作者回顾了血管内治疗、栓塞的临床和血管造影结果以及并发症。
97 例血管内手术中有 5 例(5.2%)失败,这些患者接受了开颅夹闭手术。92 例成功接受线圈栓塞治疗的动脉瘤中,64 例(69.6%)完全闭塞,28 例(30.4%)在即刻栓塞后血管造影上显示轻微的残留填充或颈部残留。97 例手术中有 7 例(7.2%)在治疗过程中发生并发症(3 例血栓栓塞事件[3.1%]和 4 例术中破裂[4.1%])。76 名患者接受了血管造影随访;其中 4 例(5.3%)显示需要再次治疗的再通证据。76 名患者的临床结果也使用格拉斯哥结果量表进行了分级。61 例(80.3%)患者的结果为 4 或 5 级,而 15 例(19.7%)患者的结果为 3 级。7 例(7.4%)患者死亡(GOS 分级 1),2 例死于与手术相关的并发症(术中破裂),5 例死于与现有的蛛网膜下腔出血相关的并发症。
血管内瘤内线圈栓塞治疗非常小的动脉瘤,术中破裂的发生率相对较高,尤其是术中破裂。随着更复杂的血管内材料(微导管和微导丝、软质和超软质线圈、支架)的出现,血管内治疗已经成为可能,并可以带来良好的血管造影结果。