• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Discordance between structure and function in glaucoma: Possible anatomical explanations.

作者信息

Sherman Jerome, Slotnick Samantha, Boneta Juliana

机构信息

State University of New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Optometry. 2009 Sep;80(9):487-501. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2008.12.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.optm.2008.12.011
PMID:19716077
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze glaucomatous eyes that show discordance between structure and function and hypothesize plausible anatomical explanations for discordance.

METHODS

Fifty eyes from 50 consecutive subjects with glaucoma (which was diagnosed according to multicenter criteria) were studied. One eye from each subject was selected randomly for inclusion, counterbalancing right eye (O.D.) and left eye (O.S.). By comparing the available structural information (from clinical disc assessment as well as GDx retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] measurements) to the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard 24-2 (SS24-2) visual field results, study eyes were assigned to the following categories: (1) positive structure-function correlation, (2) structural abnormalities with no functional deficits, and (3) functional abnormalities with no structural deficits. Structure and function also were compared on a statistical basis, utilizing the nerve fiber indicator (NFI) of the GDx and the mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) of SS24-2 visual fields.

RESULTS

Forty-four eyes were classified in category 1, 5 eyes in category 2, and 1 eye in category 3. Scatter plots showing the relationship between the NFI and MD and between the NFI and PSD depict a positive correlation in the 44 category 1 eyes with R(2) values of 0.465 and 0.322, respectively. The remaining 6 eyes with discordant structural and functional findings were analyzed in detail.

CONCLUSION

The majority (88%) of glaucoma cases show concordance between structural loss and functional deficits. The primary proposed explanations for discordance include (1) visual field sampling and test selection limitations (i.e., the SS24-2 samples only axons that are anatomically connected to photoreceptors in the central retina, whereas the GDx samples virtually all axons) and (2) GDx measurement limitations in the papillo-macula bundle (i.e., the GDx has difficulty differentiating the normally thin RNFL from the pathologically even thinner RNFL). Tests of both structure and function are recommended in glaucoma suspects and patients, as neither mode is capable of identifying all glaucomatous deficits. Due to the apparent diagnostic benefit that the peripheral functional data may provide, we strongly recommend that future studies evaluating the structure-function relationship in glaucoma record peripheral (60-4) visual fields for all subjects at the outset of the study.

摘要

相似文献

1
Discordance between structure and function in glaucoma: Possible anatomical explanations.
Optometry. 2009 Sep;80(9):487-501. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2008.12.011.
2
Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者中GDx VCC参数与消色差视野检查的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):281-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212235.88416.bd.
3
Retinal nerve fiber layer height in high-tension glaucoma and healthy eyes.高眼压性青光眼和健康眼睛的视网膜神经纤维层高度
J Glaucoma. 1998 Feb;7(1):1-7.
4
[Correlation of the Heidelberg retinal tomograph, evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer and perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].[海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪、视网膜神经纤维层评估及视野检查在青光眼诊断中的相关性]
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2007 Nov;63(6):403-14.
5
Quantifying retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma using a model of unilateral hypertensive pseudoexfoliation syndrome.使用单侧高血压性假性剥脱综合征模型量化青光眼患者视网膜神经纤维层的损失。
J Glaucoma. 2009 Oct-Nov;18(8):601-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996ef4.
6
Preperimetric glaucoma assessment with scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC): analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer by sectors.使用扫描激光偏振仪(GDx VCC)进行青光眼视野检查前评估:按象限分析视网膜神经纤维层
J Glaucoma. 2007 Dec;16(8):659-64. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318093e5bf.
7
Comparison of mean deviation with AGIS and CIGTS scores in association with structural parameters in glaucomatous eyes.青光眼患者眼中平均偏差与AGIS和CIGTS评分及结构参数的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2009 Jun-Jul;18(5):379-84. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181879e75.
8
[The retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. II. The status of the nerve fiber layer and development of changes in the visual field. Prospective study].[青光眼患者的视网膜神经纤维层。II. 神经纤维层状态及视野变化的发展。前瞻性研究]
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2000 May;56(3):149-53.
9
Retinal nerve fiber layer images captured by GDx-VCC in early diagnosis of glaucoma.GDx-VCC 采集的视网膜神经纤维层图像在青光眼早期诊断中的应用
Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(1):17-20. doi: 10.1159/000109273. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
10
Visual field changes after transient elevation of intraocular pressure in eyes with and without glaucoma.眼压短暂升高后青光眼患者与非青光眼患者的视野变化
Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.063. Epub 2007 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting 60-4 visual field tests using 3D facial reconstruction.利用 3D 面部重建预测 60-4 视野测试。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 18;108(1):112-116. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-321651.
2
Phenotypic Description of the Spanish Multicentre Genetic Glaucoma Group Cohort.西班牙多中心遗传性青光眼队列的表型描述
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1907454. doi: 10.1155/2017/1907454. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
3
Sensitivity and specificity of the iVue iWellnessExam™ in detecting retinal and optic nerve disorders.iVue iWellnessExam™ 在检测视网膜和视神经疾病方面的敏感性和特异性。
Eye Brain. 2013 Feb 13;5:9-21. doi: 10.2147/EB.S40322. eCollection 2013.
4
Novice Reviewers Retain High Sensitivity and Specificity of Posterior Segment Disease Identification with iWellnessExam™.新手评审员使用iWellnessExam™对后段疾病进行识别时,仍保持高敏感性和特异性。
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1964254. doi: 10.1155/2016/1964254. Epub 2016 Jan 6.