van Geest-Daalderop Johanna H H, Péquériaux Nathalie C V, van den Besselaar Anton M H P
Thrombosis Service, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Sep;102(3):588-92. doi: 10.1160/TH09-02-0092.
Within each patient treated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), variation of the international normalised ratio (INR) occurs over the treatment period. The purpose of the present study was to assess INR variation in selected patients on long-term treatment in whom the dose of VKA was not changed. This type of variation is considered as "biological variation" which is caused by many factors but not VKA dose changes or other medication. Four groups of long-term patients were examined: each group with a different VKA (acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon) or a different target intensity (INR 2.0-3.5 or 2.5-4.0). All patients were monitored with the same PT system (Hepato Quick, STA-R Evolution coagulation instrument) by one laboratory. The variation of the INR within each patient was expressed as coefficient of variation (CV, in %). The CV was corrected for the average imprecision of the INR measurement (CV, 2.4%). The mean corrected CV values for the four groups were: 10.9% (acenocoumarol, target INR 2.0-3.5); 10.5% (acenocoumarol, target INR 2.5-4.0); 10.4% (phenprocoumon, target INR 2.0-3.5); 9.1% (phenprocoumon, target INR 2.5-4.0). The analytical performance goal for the INR measurement (imprecision) can be derived from the within-subject biological variation. Desirable INR imprecision goals are <4.9% and <5.3% CV for monitoring of phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol, respectively. These goals were achieved using the aforesaid PT system.
在接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗的每位患者中,国际标准化比值(INR)在治疗期间都会发生变化。本研究的目的是评估长期接受治疗且VKA剂量未改变的特定患者的INR变化情况。这种变化被视为“生物学变异”,它由多种因素引起,而非VKA剂量变化或其他药物所致。研究对四组长期患者进行了检查:每组使用不同的VKA(醋硝香豆素或苯丙香豆素)或不同的目标强度(INR 2.0 - 3.5或2.5 - 4.0)。所有患者均由同一个实验室使用相同的凝血酶原时间(PT)检测系统(Hepato Quick,STA - R Evolution凝血分析仪)进行监测。每位患者INR的变化用变异系数(CV,以%表示)来体现。CV针对INR测量的平均不精密度(CV,2.4%)进行了校正。四组的平均校正CV值分别为:10.9%(醋硝香豆素,目标INR 2.0 - 3.5);10.5%(醋硝香豆素,目标INR 2.5 - 4.0);10.4%(苯丙香豆素,目标INR 2.0 - 3.5);9.1%(苯丙香豆素,目标INR 2.5 - 4.0)。INR测量的分析性能目标(不精密度)可从个体内生物学变异推导得出。监测苯丙香豆素和醋硝香豆素时,理想的INR不精密度目标分别为CV < 4.9%和CV < 5.3%。使用上述PT系统实现了这些目标。