• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病评分模型是人类免疫缺陷病毒1感染的终末期肝病患者最佳的预后因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。

The model for end-stage liver disease score is the best prognostic factor in human immunodeficiency virus 1-infected patients with end-stage liver disease: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Murillas Javier, Rimola Antonio, Laguno Montserrat, de Lazzari Elisa, Rascón Javier, Agüero Fernando, Blanco José L, Moitinho Eduardo, Moreno Asunción, Miró José M

机构信息

Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2009 Sep;15(9):1133-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.21735.

DOI:10.1002/lt.21735
PMID:19718643
Abstract

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) has become the main cause of mortality in patients coinfected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus in developed countries. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of and prognostic factors for ESLD, with particular attention paid to features affecting liver transplantation. This was a prospective cohort study in 2 Spanish community-based hospitals performed between 1999 and 2004. One hundred four consecutive patients with cirrhosis and a first clinical decompensation of their chronic liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 10 months (endpoint: death, liver transplantation, or the last checkup date), 61 patients (59%) died. The probability of mortality (Kaplan-Meier method) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI), 34%-60%], 59% (95% CI, 48%-70%), and 70% (95% Cl, 59%-81%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and the inability to reach an undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load at any time during follow-up were the only variables independently associated with the risk of death (P < 0.001). Fifteen (14%) of the 104 patients were accepted for liver transplantation, although only 5 underwent the procedure, and 10 died while on the waiting list. The waiting list mortality rate in patients with a MELD score < 20 and in patients with a MELD score >20 was 58% and 100%, respectively (median follow-up, 5 months). In conclusion, HIV-1-infected patients with ESLD, especially those with poorly controlled HIV and a high MELD score, have a poor short-term outcome. The MELD score may be useful in deciding whether to indicate liver transplantation in these patients. However, because only a small proportion of the patients in this study were considered candidates for liver transplantation and most died while on the waiting list, few received a transplant.

摘要

在发达国家,终末期肝病(ESLD)已成为人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)与乙型肝炎病毒或丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的主要死亡原因。本研究旨在描述ESLD的自然病程及预后因素,尤其关注影响肝移植的特征。这是一项于1999年至2004年在西班牙2家社区医院开展的前瞻性队列研究。104例连续性肝硬化患者及首次出现慢性肝病临床失代偿或肝细胞癌的患者被纳入研究。在中位随访10个月期间(终点:死亡、肝移植或最后一次检查日期),61例患者(59%)死亡。1年、2年和3年的死亡概率(Kaplan-Meier法)分别为43%[95%置信区间(CI),34%-60%]、59%(95%CI,48%-70%)和70%(95%CI,59%-81%)。多因素分析显示,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分以及随访期间任何时间均无法使血浆HIV-1 RNA病毒载量降至检测不到水平是与死亡风险独立相关的唯一变量(P<0.001)。104例患者中有15例(14%)被接受肝移植评估,尽管仅5例接受了手术,10例在等待名单上死亡。MELD评分<20的患者和MELD评分>20的患者等待名单死亡率分别为58%和100%(中位随访时间,5个月)。总之,合并ESLD的HIV-1感染患者,尤其是HIV控制不佳且MELD评分高的患者,短期预后较差。MELD评分可能有助于决定是否对这些患者进行肝移植。然而,由于本研究中仅一小部分患者被视为肝移植候选者,且大多数在等待名单上死亡,接受移植的患者很少。

相似文献

1
The model for end-stage liver disease score is the best prognostic factor in human immunodeficiency virus 1-infected patients with end-stage liver disease: a prospective cohort study.终末期肝病评分模型是人类免疫缺陷病毒1感染的终末期肝病患者最佳的预后因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Sep;15(9):1133-41. doi: 10.1002/lt.21735.
2
Viable strategies to facilitate liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus coinfection.促进人类免疫缺陷病毒合并感染患者肝移植的可行策略。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Sep;15(9):1003-6. doi: 10.1002/lt.21840.
3
Improved outcome of adult recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease score and a small-for-size graft.终末期肝病模型评分高且移植物过小的成年受者的预后改善。
Liver Transpl. 2009 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.1002/lt.21606.
4
Predicting mortality risk in patients with compensated HCV-induced cirrhosis: a long-term prospective study.预测代偿期丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)所致肝硬化患者的死亡风险:一项长期前瞻性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1147-58. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.31. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
First report on a series of HIV patients undergoing rapamycin monotherapy after liver transplantation.首例肝移植后接受雷帕霉素单药治疗的 HIV 患者系列报告。
Transplantation. 2010 Mar 27;89(6):733-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c7dcc0.
6
The natural history of hepatitis C cirrhosis after liver transplantation.肝移植后丙型肝炎肝硬化的自然病史。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Sep;15(9):1063-71. doi: 10.1002/lt.21784.
7
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score system to evaluate patients with viral hepatitis on the waiting list: better than the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system?用于评估等待肝移植患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统:比Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)系统更好吗?
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1906-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.072.
8
Long-term outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and comparison with human immunodeficiency virus-negative cases.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者原位肝移植的长期预后及与人类免疫缺陷病毒阴性病例的比较。
Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):1119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.124.
9
Natural history of post-liver transplantation hepatitis C: A review of factors that may influence its course.肝移植后丙型肝炎的自然史:影响其病程的因素综述。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Dec;15(12):1872-81. doi: 10.1002/lt.21954.
10
Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.肝移植等待名单中终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分分析
Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: History, Progress, and Frontiers.HIV 感染者的实体器官移植:历史、进展与前沿。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Jun;16(3):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s11904-019-00440-x.
2
A Brazilian university hospital position regarding transplantation criteria for HIV-positive patients according to the current literature.根据当前文献,巴西某大学医院针对 HIV 阳性患者的移植标准的职位描述。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019 Apr 1;74:e941. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e941.
3
Serum Caspase-Cleaved Cytokeratin (M30) Indicates Severity of Liver Dysfunction and Predicts Liver Outcome.
血清半胱天冬酶切割细胞角蛋白(M30)提示肝功能障碍的严重程度并预测肝脏预后。
Ann Transplant. 2018 Jun 8;23:393-400. doi: 10.12659/AOT.908031.
4
Ventilator associated pneumonia following liver transplantation: Etiology, risk factors and outcome.肝移植术后呼吸机相关性肺炎:病因、危险因素及结局
World J Transplant. 2016 Jun 24;6(2):389-95. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.389.
5
Survival in HIV-positive transplant recipients compared with transplant candidates and with HIV-negative controls.与移植候选者及HIV阴性对照相比,HIV阳性移植受者的生存率。
AIDS. 2016 Jan 28;30(3):435-44. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000934.
6
Role of liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus positive patients.肝移植在人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性患者中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12311-21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12311.
7
MELD Score Kinetics in Decompensated HIV+/HCV+ Patients: A Useful Prognostic Tool (ANRS HC EP 25 PRETHEVIC Cohort Study).失代偿期HIV+/HCV+患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分动力学:一种有用的预后工具(ANRS HC EP 25 PRETHEVIC队列研究)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1239. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001239.
8
Clinical characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus patients being referred for liver transplant evaluation: a descriptive cohort study.接受肝移植评估的人类免疫缺陷病毒患者的临床特征:一项描述性队列研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2015 Aug;17(4):527-35. doi: 10.1111/tid.12395. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Ascertainment and verification of end-stage renal disease and end-stage liver disease in the north american AIDS cohort collaboration on research and design.北美艾滋病队列协作研究与设计中终末期肾病和终末期肝病的确定与验证。
AIDS Res Treat. 2015;2015:923194. doi: 10.1155/2015/923194. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
Pros and cons of liver transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus infected recipients.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染受者肝移植的利弊
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 14;20(18):5353-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5353.