Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Case Postale 2, 2007 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 Jul 1;45(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00130-2.
Abstract Studies on the diversity of environmental culturable Pseudomonas populations are dependent on the isolation procedure. This procedure includes the use of selective media which may influence the recovery of strains and thus the diversity described. In this study, we assessed the use of two agar isolation media for describing the diversity of soil- and root-inhabiting Pseudomonas associated with the perennial grass Molinia coerulea. A total of 382 Pseudomonas strains were recovered on either non-selective Angle's medium, or on Gould's modified S1 (mS1) Pseudomonas-selective medium. Their diversity was assessed by restriction analysis of PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-amplified 16S-23S rDNA internal transcript spacer sequences. The comparison of mS1- and Angle-recovered populations showed that the use of mS1 selective medium led to an underestimation of both Pseudomonas counts and diversity, especially in the soil environment.
摘要 对环境可培养假单胞菌种群多样性的研究取决于分离程序。该程序包括使用选择性培养基,这可能会影响菌株的回收,从而影响所描述的多样性。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种琼脂分离培养基在描述与多年生草 Molinia coerulea 相关的土壤和根际假单胞菌多样性中的用途。总共从非选择性 Angle 培养基或 Gould 的改良 S1 (mS1) 假单胞菌选择性培养基中回收了 382 株假单胞菌。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增的 16S-23S rDNA 内部转录间隔区序列的限制性分析评估了它们的多样性。mS1 和 Angle 回收种群的比较表明,使用 mS1 选择性培养基会导致假单胞菌计数和多样性的低估,特别是在土壤环境中。