Ekegren Christina L, Miller William C, Celebrini Richard G, Eng Janice J, Macintyre Donna L
Division of Physiotherapy, Brunel University, West London, UK.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;39(9):665-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3004.
Nonexperimental methodological study.
To determine the interrater and intrarater reliability and validity of using observational risk-screening guidelines to evaluate dynamic knee valgus.
A deficiency in the neuromuscular control of the hip has been identified as a key risk factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in postpubescent females. This deficiency can manifest itself as a valgus knee alignment during tasks involving hip and knee flexion. There are currently no scientifically tested methods to screen for dynamic knee valgus in the clinic or on the field.
Three physiotherapists used observational risk-screening guidelines to rate 40 adolescent female soccer players according to their risk of ACL injury. The rating was based on the amount of dynamic knee valgus observed on a drop-jump landing. Ratings were evaluated for intrarater and interrater agreement using kappa coefficients. Sensitivity and specificity of ratings were evaluated by comparing observational ratings, with measurements obtained using 3-dimensional (3-D) motion analysis.
Kappa coefficients for intrarater and interrater agreement ranged from 0.75 to 0.85, indicating that ratings were reasonably consistent over time and between physiotherapists. Sensitivity values were inadequate, ranging from 67% to 87%. This indicated that raters failed to detect up to a third of "truly high-risk" individuals. Specificity values ranged from 60% to 72%, which was considered adequate for the purposes of the screening.
Observational risk screening is a practical and cost-effective method of screening for ACL injury risk. Rater agreement and specificity were acceptable for this method, but sensitivity was not. To detect a greater proportion of individuals at risk of ACL injury, coaches and clinicians should ensure that they include additional tests for other high-risk characteristics in their screening protocols.
非实验性方法学研究。
确定使用观察性风险筛查指南评估动态膝外翻的评分者间信度、评分者内信度及效度。
已确定青春期后女性非接触性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的关键风险因素是髋部神经肌肉控制不足。这种不足在涉及髋部和膝部屈曲的任务中可表现为膝内翻。目前在临床或现场尚无经科学验证的方法来筛查动态膝外翻。
三名物理治疗师使用观察性风险筛查指南,根据40名青少年女子足球运动员ACL损伤的风险进行评分。评分基于在纵跳落地时观察到的动态膝外翻程度。使用kappa系数评估评分者内和评分者间一致性的评分。通过将观察性评分与使用三维(3-D)运动分析获得的测量结果进行比较,评估评分的敏感性和特异性。
评分者内和评分者间一致性的kappa系数范围为0.75至0.85,表明评分随时间推移以及在物理治疗师之间具有合理的一致性。敏感性值不足,范围为67%至87%。这表明评分者未能检测到多达三分之一的“真正高风险”个体。特异性值范围为60%至72%,就筛查目的而言被认为是足够的。
观察性风险筛查是一种实用且具有成本效益的ACL损伤风险筛查方法。该方法的评分者一致性和特异性是可接受的,但敏感性不可接受。为了检测出更大比例的ACL损伤风险个体,教练和临床医生应确保在其筛查方案中纳入针对其他高风险特征的额外测试。