Suppr超能文献

[用新型非苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药丁螺环酮及其主要代谢物1-(2-嘧啶基)哌嗪(1-PP)对家兔进行脑电图研究]

[Electroencephalographic study with buspirone, a novel nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic, and its major metabolite, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine (1-PP), in rabbits].

作者信息

Kawasaki H, Nakamura S, Takasaki K

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Miyazaki Medical College, Japan.

出版信息

Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1990 Mar;95(3):91-104. doi: 10.1254/fpj.95.91.

Abstract

The electroencephalographic (EEG) effects of buspirone and its major metabolite, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine (1-PP), were investigated in rabbits with chronic electrode implants, and the effects were compared with those of diazepam. Intravenous administration of buspirone at 0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg evoked an increase in the arousal EEG pattern period (low amplitude fast waves) in the cortical EEG and synchronization of the hippocampal theta waves with decreased voltages, whereas both 1-PP (0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and diazepam (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) evoked an increase in the drowsy EEG pattern periods: high voltage slow waves and spindle bursts in the cortical EEG and desynchronization of the hippocampal theta waves. Buspirone at higher doses caused behavioral excitation in rabbits, whereas both 1-PP and diazepam produced sedation. Buspirone did not affect EEG arousal responses to both auditory stimulation (2,000 Hz, monotone) and electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 0.1 msec, 3-6 V) of the midbrain reticular formation or the posterior hypothalamus. However, 1-PP tended to inhibit the EEG arousal response to auditory stimulation but not brain stimulation, and diazepam markedly suppressed the responses induced by both stimulations. The recruiting response induced by centromedian thalamic stimulation at a low frequency (7 Hz, 0.1 msec, 4-8 V) was not affected by buspirone, 1-PP and diazepam. Neither buspirone nor 1-PP had an effect on the photic driving response to a flash light (2 Hz) in the occipital cortex of the rabbit, whereas the response was suppressed by diazepam. Both buspirone and 1-PP enhanced the duration of after discharges induced by electrical stimulation (50 Hz, 0.5 msec, 4-15 V) of the dorsal hippocampus, whereas diazepam markedly inhibited the afterdischarges. These results suggest that the EEG effect of buspirone is quite different to those of 1-PP and diazepam in qualitative aspects. It is also suggested that buspirone, unlike diazepam, is an effective anxiolytic drug without a sedative effect.

摘要

在慢性植入电极的家兔中研究了丁螺环酮及其主要代谢产物1-(2-嘧啶基)哌嗪(1-PP)的脑电图(EEG)效应,并将其与地西泮的效应进行比较。静脉注射0.1至1.0mg/kg的丁螺环酮可引起皮层脑电图中觉醒EEG模式期(低幅快波)增加,海马θ波同步化且电压降低,而1-PP(0.5至2.0mg/kg,静脉注射)和地西泮(1.0和2.0mg/kg)均引起困倦EEG模式期增加:皮层脑电图中的高电压慢波和纺锤波爆发,以及海马θ波去同步化。高剂量的丁螺环酮可引起家兔行为兴奋,而1-PP和地西泮均产生镇静作用。丁螺环酮不影响对中脑网状结构或下丘脑后部的听觉刺激(2000Hz,单调音)和电刺激(100Hz,0.1毫秒,3-6V)的EEG觉醒反应。然而,1-PP倾向于抑制对听觉刺激的EEG觉醒反应,但不影响对脑刺激的反应,而地西泮则显著抑制两种刺激诱导的反应。低频(7Hz,0.1毫秒,4-8V)丘脑中央中核刺激诱导的募集反应不受丁螺环酮、1-PP和地西泮的影响。丁螺环酮和1-PP对家兔枕叶皮层对闪光(2Hz)的光驱动反应均无影响,而该反应被地西泮抑制。丁螺环酮和1-PP均延长了海马背侧电刺激(50Hz,0.5毫秒,4-15V)诱导的后放电持续时间,而地西泮则显著抑制后放电。这些结果表明,丁螺环酮的EEG效应在质的方面与1-PP和地西泮有很大不同。还表明,与地西泮不同,丁螺环酮是一种有效的抗焦虑药物,无镇静作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验