Tyson Phyllis
University of Washington, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2009 Aug;57(4):919-45. doi: 10.1177/0003065109342881.
In an era of managed care, psychoanalytic treatment of children is under fire as critics question whether the evidence of success in child analysis is sufficiently robust to warrant the large commitment of time and money required for this treatment. This article chronicles the history and current state of research at the Anna Freud Centre, and describes the evolution of a database that has methodically recorded and systematically organized data from over 750 cases of children referred to the Centre over a forty-five-year period. Analysis of this database has determined what kinds of childhood disorders are best treated with intensive psychoanalysis, and what kinds do not respond to this form of treatment. A long-term follow-up of a small sample of these childreen suggests the kinds of long-term benefits that can be gained when an individual is treated with intensive psychoanalysis as a child. As an example, clinical material from the analysis of an eight-year-old is presented along with follow-up interview data twenty-five years later.
在管理式医疗的时代,儿童精神分析治疗受到抨击,批评者质疑儿童分析的成功证据是否足够有力,以保证这种治疗所需投入的大量时间和金钱。本文记录了安娜·弗洛伊德中心的研究历史和现状,并描述了一个数据库的演变过程,该数据库系统地记录并整理了45年间转介到该中心的750多例儿童病例的数据。对这个数据库的分析确定了哪些类型的儿童障碍最适合用强化精神分析治疗,哪些类型对这种治疗形式没有反应。对这些儿童中的一小部分进行的长期随访表明,儿童接受强化精神分析治疗后可能获得的长期益处。例如,文中呈现了一名八岁儿童的分析临床资料以及25年后的随访访谈数据。