Cho Song-Mee, Kim Hyeon-Sook, Halkar Raghuveer, Chung Soo-Kyo, Song Kyung-Sup, Lee Kang-Hoon, Lee Bae Young, Park Yong Gyu, Park Ju Youn
Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Nucl Med Commun. 2010 Jan;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328330c791.
The location of a myocardial lesion on a wall thickening polar map often does not coincide with the location of the lesion on a perfusion polar map, especially when the myocardial lesion is located at the mid cardiac region. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and extent of discrepancy in the location of the lesion between perfusion and wall thickening polar maps on gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using lesion axis angle (LAA).
One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients (male : female = 80 : 67, age range: 41-96 years) who underwent myocardial gated (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT on the suspicion of myocardial ischemia or infarct between September 2003 and September 2008 and showed both reduced myocardial perfusion and wall thickening on gated SPECT at mid cardiac region were reviewed. LAA, which is the angle between the lesion axis on perfusion and wall thickening polar maps, was measured for the patients who showed a discrepancy in lesion axis between the two polar maps. LAA was said to have a positive value when the lesion axis of the wall thickening polar map showed a counterclockwise angular rotation as compared with that of a perfusion polar map. The patients with LAA of less than 10 degrees were considered as having no lesion axis discrepancy between perfusion and wall thickening polar maps. LAA was correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on gated SPECT using Pearson's correlation. Furthermore, two groups, one with LAA of >or=10 degrees and the other with LAA less than 10 degrees were correlated with dichotomous groups with >or=50% and less than 50% LVEF, using the chi(2) test. Then, 35 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS group) were analyzed separately for correlation between LAA and LVEF.
The mean +/- SD of LAA was 44.31+/-30.77 degrees (range: 0-145 degrees ). LAA was 0-10 degrees in 25 patients, 11-30 degrees in 24 patients, 31-60 degrees in 58 patients, 61-90 degrees in 30 patients, and >90 degrees in 10 patients. In addition, the lesion axis of the wall thickening polar map as compared with that of the perfusion polar map was rotated in the counterclockwise direction in 122 patients and not rotated in 25 patients. LVEF on gated SPECT showed positive correlation with LAA (P = 0.000147). In addition, there was statistically significant correlation (P = 0.001) when the two groups with LAA of >or=10 degrees and less than 10 degrees , respectively, were correlated with the groups of >or=50% and less than 50% LVEF. For the ACS group, the mean +/- SD of LAA was 45.88+/-30.30 degrees (range: 0-135 degrees ) and LVEF showed positive correlation with LAA (P = 0.0001). There was no significant statistical difference concerning LAA and LVEF between ACS group and non-ACS group (P = 0.725 and P = 0.473, respectively).
In most of our patients with coronary artery disease, the lesion axis of reduced wall thickening was rotated in the counterclockwise direction as compared with that of reduced perfusion on SPECT polar maps, especially when the myocardial lesion was at mid cardiac region. The LAA decreased as the LVEF decreased. This might be related to spatiotemporal distortion of myocardial contraction mentioned in the helical heart concept.
心肌病变在心肌壁增厚极坐标图上的位置通常与灌注极坐标图上病变的位置不一致,尤其是当心肌病变位于心脏中部区域时。本研究的目的是使用病变轴角度(LAA)来确定门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)上灌注极坐标图与心肌壁增厚极坐标图之间病变位置差异的频率和程度。
回顾了2003年9月至2008年9月期间连续147例因怀疑心肌缺血或梗死而接受心肌门控(99m)Tc - 替曲膦SPECT检查的患者(男∶女 = 80∶67,年龄范围:41 - 96岁),这些患者在门控SPECT上显示心脏中部区域心肌灌注和心肌壁增厚均降低。对于在两个极坐标图上病变轴存在差异的患者,测量LAA,即灌注极坐标图与心肌壁增厚极坐标图上病变轴之间的角度。当心肌壁增厚极坐标图的病变轴相对于灌注极坐标图的病变轴呈逆时针旋转时,LAA被认为具有正值。LAA小于10度的患者被认为在灌注极坐标图与心肌壁增厚极坐标图之间没有病变轴差异。使用Pearson相关性分析将LAA与门控SPECT上的左心室射血分数(LVEF)相关联。此外,使用卡方检验将LAA大于或等于10度的一组和LAA小于10度的另一组与LVEF大于或等于50%和小于50%的二分法组相关联。然后,分别分析35例急性冠状动脉综合征患者(ACS组)的LAA与LVEF之间的相关性。
LAA的平均值±标准差为44.31±30.77度(范围:0 - 145度)。25例患者的LAA为0 - 10度,24例患者为11 - 30度,58例患者为31 - 60度,30例患者为61 - 90度,10例患者大于90度。此外,与灌注极坐标图相比,心肌壁增厚极坐标图的病变轴在122例患者中呈逆时针方向旋转,在25例患者中未旋转。门控SPECT上的LVEF与LAA呈正相关(P = 0.000147)。此外,当LAA大于或等于10度和小于10度的两组分别与LVEF大于或等于50%和小于50%的组相关联时,存在统计学显著相关性(P = 0.001)。对于ACS组,LAA的平均值±标准差为45.88±30.30度(范围:0 - 135度),LVEF与LAA呈正相关(P = 0.0001)。ACS组与非ACS组之间在LAA和LVEF方面无显著统计学差异(分别为P = 0.725和P = 0.473)。
在我们大多数冠心病患者中,与SPECT极坐标图上灌注降低相比,心肌壁增厚降低的病变轴呈逆时针方向旋转,尤其是当心肌病变位于心脏中部区域时。LAA随着LVEF降低而降低。这可能与螺旋心脏概念中提到的心肌收缩的时空扭曲有关。