Bryngelson Anna
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Nov;37(8):839-45. doi: 10.1177/1403494809346871. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
In previous research, ill-health and marginalization from the labour market have been pointed out as potential triggers for being marginalized from other spheres of society as well, e.g. economic, political and social, i.e. social exclusion. However, very few studies have examined the consequences of long-term sickness absence.
The research question raised here is therefore to examine the relationship between long-term sickness absence (> or = 60 days) and social exclusion among individuals.
The logistic regression analyses are based on longitudinal data (n = 3,144) from the Swedish Level of Living Survey linked to register data.
The results suggest that both women and men have higher odds of having no excess cash (''cash margins'') after their long-term sickness absence, compared with people with no such sickness absence. Women seem more likely to have no cash margins combined with being single/unmarried and having no close friends after long-term sickness absence, than do women without such sick-listing. The results indicate a slight mediating effect of employment status on the odds ratios for these economic and social conditions.
The present study suggests that long-term sickness absence increases the risk of adverse economic and social conditions among individuals. That these conditions can be seen as indicators of social exclusion is more doubtful.
在以往的研究中,健康不佳和劳动力市场边缘化被指出是导致在社会其他领域(如经济、政治和社会领域,即社会排斥)被边缘化的潜在触发因素。然而,很少有研究考察长期病假的后果。
因此,这里提出的研究问题是考察个人长期病假(≥60天)与社会排斥之间的关系。
逻辑回归分析基于来自瑞典生活水平调查的纵向数据(n = 3144),并与登记数据相关联。
结果表明,与没有长期病假的人相比,长期病假后没有多余现金(“现金边际”)的男性和女性的几率更高。与没有此类病假记录的女性相比,长期病假后,单身/未婚且没有亲密朋友的女性似乎更有可能没有现金边际。结果表明就业状况对这些经济和社会状况的比值比有轻微的中介作用。
本研究表明,长期病假会增加个人出现不良经济和社会状况的风险。而这些状况是否可被视为社会排斥的指标则更值得怀疑。