Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, MVR Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Dec;7(3):307-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
There are several ways to measure fatness and obesity, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The primary measure for tracking the prevalence of obesity has historically been body mass index (BMI). This paper compares long-run trends in the prevalence of obesity when obesity is defined using skinfold thickness instead of BMI, using data from the full series of U.S. National Health Examination Surveys. The results indicate that when one uses skinfold thickness rather than BMI to define obesity, the rise in the prevalence of obesity is detectable 10-20 years earlier. This underscores the importance of examining multiple measures of fatness when monitoring or otherwise studying obesity.
有几种方法可以衡量肥胖和超重,每种方法都有其优点和缺点。在过去,跟踪肥胖症流行情况的主要指标一直是身体质量指数(BMI)。本文使用美国国家健康检查调查的完整系列数据,比较了使用皮褶厚度而不是 BMI 来定义肥胖症时肥胖症流行率的长期趋势。结果表明,当使用皮褶厚度而不是 BMI 来定义肥胖症时,肥胖症的流行率上升可提前 10-20 年检测到。这强调了在监测或研究肥胖症时,检查多种脂肪测量方法的重要性。