Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Econ Hum Biol. 2012 Dec;10(4):405-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
The literature that examines the relationship between child or adolescent Body Mass Index (BMI) and academic attainment generally finds mixed results. This may be due to the use of different data sets, conditioning variables, or methodologies: studies either use an individual fixed effects (FE) approach and/or an instrumental variable (IV) specification. Using one common dataset, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, and a common set of controls, this paper compares the different approaches (including using different types of IV's), discusses their appropriateness, and contrasts their findings. We show that, although the results differ depending on the approach, most estimates cannot be statistically distinguished from OLS, nor from each other. Examining the potential violations of key assumptions of the different approaches and comparing their point estimates, we conclude that fat mass is unlikely to be causally related to academic achievement in adolescence.
文献研究了儿童或青少年的体重指数 (BMI) 与学业成绩之间的关系,通常得出的结果不一致。这可能是由于使用了不同的数据集、调节变量或方法:研究使用了个体固定效应 (FE) 方法和/或工具变量 (IV) 规范。本文使用一个常见的数据集——雅芳纵向研究父母和孩子,以及一组共同的控制变量,比较了不同的方法(包括使用不同类型的 IV),讨论了它们的适当性,并对比了它们的发现。我们表明,尽管结果因方法而异,但大多数估计值在统计上无法与 OLS 区分,也无法相互区分。通过检查不同方法的关键假设的潜在违反情况,并比较它们的点估计值,我们得出结论,脂肪量不太可能与青春期的学业成绩有因果关系。