Guha Santanu, Sardar Partha, Guha Pradipta, Roy Sarita, Mookerjee Soura, Chakrabarti Prantar, Deb P K, Chaudhuri Utpal, Deb Suryyani, Karmakar Rathindranath, Dasgupta Anjan Kr, Lahiri Prabir
Department of Cardiology, Medical College, Kolkata, India.
Indian Heart J. 2009 Jan-Feb;61(1):68-73.
Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the management of the atherosclerotic vascular disease. Aspirin and clopidogrel are the two most commonly used antiplatelet drugs in its management. Recently, there has been a concern about the development of resistance to one or both antiplatelet agents with potentially devastating consequences. In this study we tried to assess the in vitro resistance to antiplatelet agents in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
144 patients presenting with ACS, who were not on any antiplatelet therapy prior to hospital admission were evaluated in this study. Baseline clinical data was obtained before giving the oral loading dose of aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients received a loading dose of 325 mg of aspirin and 300 mg of clopidogrel followed by a daily dose of 150 mg. of aspirin and 75 mg.of clopidogrel. After 7 days of dual antiplatelet therapy, platelet aggregation pattern was analyzed using optical aggregometer (chrono-log). Response to aspirin and clopidogrel was assessed by interaction with collagen (2microg/ml) and Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (10micro/ml) respectively. The results were analyzed. Response to doubling the dose of antiplatelet agents was also observed in 6 aspirin resistant patients, 12 clopidogrel resistant patients and in 6 patients resistant to the effect of dual antiplatelet agents.
There were 22 patients (15.27%) who showed poor response to aspirin, 28 patients (19.44%) to clopidogrel (primary non-responder) and 18 patients (12.5%) showed a primary non-responsiveness to both the antiplatelet agents in the usual doses. After dose doubling, all 6 aspirin resistant patients showed adequate response but 4 out of 12 clopidogrel resistant patients showed inadequate response.
This pilot study brings out a disquieting picture of 12.5% patients suffering from ACS showing resistance to the antiplatelet effects of both aspirin and clopidogrel in the conventional dose. A long-term prospective randomized controlled trial is required to give an insight into this problem and its clinical consequences.
抗血小板治疗是动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病管理的基石。阿司匹林和氯吡格雷是其管理中最常用的两种抗血小板药物。最近,人们担心对一种或两种抗血小板药物产生耐药性,这可能会带来毁灭性后果。在本研究中,我们试图评估急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者对抗血小板药物的体外耐药性。
本研究评估了144例ACS患者,这些患者在入院前未接受任何抗血小板治疗。在给予阿司匹林和氯吡格雷口服负荷剂量之前获取基线临床数据。患者接受325mg阿司匹林和300mg氯吡格雷的负荷剂量,随后每日剂量为150mg阿司匹林和75mg氯吡格雷。在双重抗血小板治疗7天后,使用光学聚集仪(chrono-log)分析血小板聚集模式。分别通过与胶原蛋白(2μg/ml)和二磷酸腺苷(ADP)(10μg/ml)相互作用来评估对阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的反应。对结果进行分析。还观察了6例阿司匹林抵抗患者、12例氯吡格雷抵抗患者和6例对双重抗血小板药物作用抵抗患者对加倍抗血小板药物剂量的反应。
有22例患者(15.27%)对阿司匹林反应不佳,28例患者(19.44%)对氯吡格雷反应不佳(原发性无反应者),18例患者(12.5%)对常规剂量的两种抗血小板药物均表现出原发性无反应。剂量加倍后,所有6例阿司匹林抵抗患者均表现出充分反应,但12例氯吡格雷抵抗患者中有4例反应不足。
这项初步研究揭示了令人不安的情况,即12.5%的ACS患者对常规剂量的阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用均有抵抗。需要进行长期前瞻性随机对照试验,以深入了解这一问题及其临床后果。