Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):968-74. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b4e3c9.
To determine the natural history and long-term quality-of-life (QOL) outcome after conservative treatment for vestibular schwannoma.
Prospective study conducted in a university-based tertiary referral center.
A total of 70 vestibular schwannoma patients who were initially included in the wait and scan protocol between January 2002 and December 2003 were followed with a mean observation time of 43 months. All patients had small- or medium-sized tumors when they were included in the protocol. QOL was measured at diagnosis and at the end of follow-up in those patients who were still conservatively treated using the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The study group was characterized by nongrowing small tumors and relatively stable symptoms over time.
Clinical, audiometric, radiologic, and QOL results.
In 44 patients (63%), growth of the tumor was not observed, and 25 (36%) tumors did grow. Of the 70 included patients, 27 patients (39%) required treatment. Forty-one patients (59%) were still conservatively treated at the end of follow-up (mean 47 +/- 16 mo). Hearing was preserved in 16 (57%) of the 28 patients with useful hearing at diagnosis. At the end of follow-up, SF-36 scores were only slightly deteriorated for almost all subscales when compared with scores at diagnosis; however, differences were statistically not significant (p > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the presence of cochleovestibular symptoms and QOL scores (p > 0.05).
Conservative observation of small vestibular schwannomas may be regarded as a reasonable management option because most of these tumors do not grow during an initial period of observation. Conservative treatment of this subset of patients with small, nongrowing tumors does not significantly affect life functioning, as reflected in SF-36 survey data. However, hearing loss did progress in this population. Thus, patients should be counseled regarding this risk and generic QOL measures such as the SF-36 should be used with caution in future assessments. This study emphasizes the importance of combining generic and disease-specific QOL measures in future studies of protocols of vestibular schwannoma management.
确定听神经鞘瘤保守治疗后的自然病史和长期生活质量(QOL)结果。
在一所大学附属医院进行的前瞻性研究。
2002 年 1 月至 2003 年 12 月期间,共有 70 例听神经鞘瘤患者最初纳入等待和扫描方案,平均观察时间为 43 个月。所有患者在纳入方案时均为小或中等大小肿瘤。在那些仍接受保守治疗的患者中,使用健康调查简表 36 项(SF-36)在诊断时和随访结束时测量 QOL。研究组的特点是肿瘤无生长,症状随时间相对稳定。
临床、听力、影像学和 QOL 结果。
在 44 例(63%)患者中,肿瘤未生长,25 例(36%)肿瘤生长。在纳入的 70 例患者中,27 例(39%)需要治疗。在随访结束时,41 例(59%)仍接受保守治疗(平均 47+/-16 个月)。在诊断时具有有用听力的 28 例患者中,有 16 例(57%)听力保留。随访结束时,与诊断时相比,SF-36 评分几乎所有子量表都略有恶化;然而,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。存在耳蜗前庭症状与 QOL 评分之间无显著相关性(p>0.05)。
观察小听神经鞘瘤的保守治疗可能是一种合理的治疗选择,因为大多数这些肿瘤在初始观察期间不会生长。对这一小部分小、无生长肿瘤的患者进行保守治疗不会显著影响生活功能,这反映在 SF-36 调查数据中。然而,该人群的听力损失确实有所进展。因此,应对患者进行这一风险的咨询,并在未来的评估中谨慎使用 SF-36 等通用 QOL 措施。本研究强调了在未来听神经鞘瘤管理方案的研究中结合通用和疾病特异性 QOL 措施的重要性。